From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"open list:READ-COPY UPDATE..." <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rcu: Use rcu_num_nodes instead of NUM_RCU_NODES
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:26:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C67D6C.8000803@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140716124515.GQ8690@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 07/16/2014 08:45 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 06:31:49PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> NUM_RCU_NODES is set at build time and is usually a huge number. We calculate the
>> actual number of rcu nodes necessary at boot time based on nr_cpu_ids in
>> rcu_init_geometry() and store it in rcu_num_nodes. We should use this variable
>> instead of NUM_RCU_NODES.
>>
>> This commit changes all such uses of NUM_RCU_NODES to rcu_num_nodes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
>> index cedb020..17ccb62 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
>> @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static bool __read_mostly rcu_nocb_poll; /* Offload kthread are to poll. */
>> static char __initdata nocb_buf[NR_CPUS * 5];
>> #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU */
>>
>> +extern int rcu_num_nodes;
>
> This should not be necessary given the existing declaration in
> kernel/rcu/tree.c way before the #include of kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h.
>
> Or did you get a build failure without this? (And if you did get a build
> failure, I would be really curious how that happened!)
>
> So please send an updated patch or tell me how your build managed to fail.
>
Indeed. The extern was unnecessary. Please find an updated patch below.
--
Pranith
From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:21:49 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Use rcu_num_nodes instead of NUM_RCU_NODES
NUM_RCU_NODES is set at build time and is usually a huge number. We calculate the
actual number of rcu nodes necessary at boot time based on nr_cpu_ids in
rcu_init_geometry() and store it in rcu_num_nodes. We should use this variable
instead of NUM_RCU_NODES.
This commit changes all such uses of NUM_RCU_NODES to rcu_num_nodes.
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index cedb020..b99055a 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
/* Snapshot current state of ->blkd_tasks lists. */
rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rsp, rnp)
sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init(rsp, rnp);
- if (NUM_RCU_NODES > 1)
+ if (rcu_num_nodes > 1)
sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init(rsp, rcu_get_root(rsp));
put_online_cpus();
@@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ static void __init rcu_spawn_boost_kthreads(void)
BUG_ON(smpboot_register_percpu_thread(&rcu_cpu_thread_spec));
rnp = rcu_get_root(rcu_state_p);
(void)rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(rcu_state_p, rnp);
- if (NUM_RCU_NODES > 1) {
+ if (rcu_num_nodes > 1) {
rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rcu_state_p, rnp)
(void)rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(rcu_state_p, rnp);
}
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-16 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-15 22:31 [PATCH 1/3] rcu: tiny.c: Update reference to tree.c Pranith Kumar
2014-07-15 22:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] rcu: Remove stale comment in tree.c Pranith Kumar
2014-07-15 22:53 ` josh
2014-07-15 22:57 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-16 12:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-16 13:29 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-16 23:32 ` josh
2014-07-17 0:55 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-07-17 1:01 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-17 1:25 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-07-17 1:26 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-17 2:14 ` Josh Triplett
2014-07-17 2:20 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-17 23:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-15 22:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] rcu: Use rcu_num_nodes instead of NUM_RCU_NODES Pranith Kumar
2014-07-15 22:54 ` josh
2014-07-16 12:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-16 13:26 ` Pranith Kumar [this message]
2014-07-15 22:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] rcu: tiny.c: Update reference to tree.c josh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53C67D6C.8000803@gmail.com \
--to=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).