From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean up ACPI core to prepare for running ACPI on ARM64
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:39:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C70D3D.8080605@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F3285FA2B@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
On 07/16/2014 04:28 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> Are there any objections against this series from the x86 and ia64 maintainers?
>
> I'll believe the claim of no functional changes for ia64 ... so no objections from me.
>
> -Tony
>
No objection here, modulo the issue I just flagged (which is
IA64-related, not x86, so Tony is the one who actually needs to decide it.)
-hpa
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-16 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-09 9:39 [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean up ACPI core to prepare for running ACPI on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-07-09 9:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI: ARM64 does not have a BIOS add config for BIOS table scan Hanjun Guo
2014-07-16 23:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-16 23:46 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-16 23:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-17 3:18 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-17 16:58 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-18 9:22 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-09 9:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI: Don't use acpi_lapic in ACPI core code Hanjun Guo
2014-07-09 9:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ACPI / processor: Introduce ARCH_HAS_ACPI_PDC Hanjun Guo
2014-07-16 23:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean up ACPI core to prepare for running ACPI on ARM64 Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-16 23:28 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-16 23:39 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53C70D3D.8080605@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).