From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"open list:READ-COPY UPDATE..." <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Check for have_rcu_nocb_mask instead of rcu_nocb_mask
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:11:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C86615.3040107@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140717234920.GD8690@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 07/17/2014 07:49 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 05:30:11PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> This is something similar to what you found yesterday with tick_nohz_full mask.
>>
>> --
>> Pranith
>>
>> If we configure a kernel with CONFIG_NOCB_CPU=y, CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_NONE=y and
>> CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n and do not pass in a rcu_nocb= boot parameter, the
>> cpumask rcu_nocb_mask can be garbage instead of NULL.
>>
>> Hence this commit replaces checks for rcu_nocb_mask == NULL with a check for
>> have_rcu_nocb_mask.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
>
> Good catch! Could you please forward-port this to current rcu/dev?
> This now includes the fix you mentioned above, which generates conflicts.
>
> Could you please also fix the use in rcu_is_nocb_cpu()?
>
> And please see the comment below.
>
Please find the fixed patch.
--
Pranith
From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:02:54 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Feedback comments
If we configure a kernel with CONFIG_NOCB_CPU=y, CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_NONE=y and
CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n and do not pass in a rcu_nocb= boot parameter, the
cpumask rcu_nocb_mask can be garbage instead of NULL.
Hence this commit replaces checks for rcu_nocb_mask == NULL with a check for
have_rcu_nocb_mask.
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index ce8c331..8f987c1 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -2053,9 +2053,10 @@ static void rcu_init_one_nocb(struct rcu_node *rnp)
/* Is the specified CPU a no-CBs CPU? */
bool rcu_is_nocb_cpu(int cpu)
{
- if (have_rcu_nocb_mask)
- return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
- return false;
+ if (!have_rcu_nocb_mask)
+ return false;
+
+ return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
}
#endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL */
@@ -2540,7 +2541,7 @@ static void __init rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp)
struct rcu_data *rdp_leader = NULL; /* Suppress misguided gcc warn. */
struct rcu_data *rdp_prev = NULL;
- if (rcu_nocb_mask == NULL)
+ if (!have_rcu_nocb_mask)
return;
#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) && !defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL)
if (tick_nohz_full_running)
@@ -2574,9 +2575,9 @@ static void __init rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp)
/* Prevent __call_rcu() from enqueuing callbacks on no-CBs CPUs */
static bool init_nocb_callback_list(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
- if (rcu_nocb_mask == NULL ||
- !cpumask_test_cpu(rdp->cpu, rcu_nocb_mask))
+ if (!rcu_is_nocb_cpu(rdp->cpu))
return false;
+
rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = NULL;
return true;
}
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-18 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-17 21:30 [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Check for have_rcu_nocb_mask instead of rcu_nocb_mask Pranith Kumar
2014-07-17 23:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-18 0:11 ` Pranith Kumar [this message]
2014-07-19 6:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-19 6:32 ` Pranith Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53C86615.3040107@gmail.com \
--to=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox