From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, apw@canonical.com, joe@perches.com,
tytso@mit.edu, dwalter@google.com, neilb@suse.de,
hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: Remove --file option
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:37:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C92332.5010807@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140718082324.GA31270@pd.tnic>
On 07/18/2014 01:23 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:29:37AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> First, 'abuse' is a relative term. It describes a use you
>> (and possibly many others) may find objectionable, but that
>> does not mean all uses are objectionable.
>
> Do you actually have a valid use case for keeping the cmdline switch ...
>
I find it convenient to be able to check a new file before committing it
and creating a patch. Also, I find it convenient to be able use it to clean
up a file before I do heavy lifting with it. Yes, I understand the latter
is discouraged nowadays, and I would not use it anymore outside my scope
of responsibility unless specifically asked by the maintainer to do so,
but in such cases it helps me a lot to be able to address the cleanup
prior to the heavy lifting.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-18 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-17 15:34 [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: Remove --file option Richard Weinberger
2014-07-17 15:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-17 15:51 ` Joe Perches
2014-07-17 16:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-17 16:24 ` Joe Perches
2014-07-22 5:27 ` Kalle Valo
2014-08-04 14:30 ` Pavel Machek
2014-07-17 22:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-18 7:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-18 8:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-18 13:37 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2014-07-18 13:46 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-07-18 13:56 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-18 14:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-18 14:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-18 14:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-18 14:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-18 14:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-18 14:17 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-07-18 14:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-18 14:35 ` Joe Perches
2014-07-18 14:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-18 14:57 ` Joe Perches
2014-07-18 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53C92332.5010807@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dwalter@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox