Re: [PATCH 1/1] [SCSI] Fix a bug in deriving the FLUSH_TIMEOUT from the basic I/O timeout

Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org)
2014-07-18T15:11:42Z

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:51:06AM +0000, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote:
> SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (16) should be favored over SYNCHRONIZE
> CACHE (10) unless SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (10) is not supported.

I gues you mean (16) for the last occurance? What's the benefit of
using SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (16) if we don't pass a LBA range?