From: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@amd.com>
To: "Jerome Glisse" <j.glisse@gmail.com>,
"Andrew Lewycky" <Andrew.Lewycky@amd.com>,
"Michel Dänzer" <michel.daenzer@amd.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Alexey Skidanov" <Alexey.Skidanov@amd.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Bridgman, John" <John.Bridgman@amd.com>,
"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Sellek, Tom" <Tom.Sellek@amd.com>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/25] AMDKFD kernel driver
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:10:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53CE1C92.2070200@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140722072337.GG15237@phenom.ffwll.local>
On 22/07/14 10:23, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:23:43PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>> But Jerome, the core problem still remains in effect, even with your
>> suggestion. If an application, either via userspace queue or via ioctl,
>> submits a long-running kernel, than the CPU in general can't stop the
>> GPU from running it. And if that kernel does while(1); than that's it,
>> game's over, and no matter how you submitted the work. So I don't really
>> see the big advantage in your proposal. Only in CZ we can stop this wave
>> (by CP H/W scheduling only). What are you saying is basically I won't
>> allow people to use compute on Linux KV system because it _may_ get the
>> system stuck.
>>
>> So even if I really wanted to, and I may agree with you theoretically on
>> that, I can't fulfill your desire to make the "kernel being able to
>> preempt at any time and be able to decrease or increase user queue
>> priority so overall kernel is in charge of resources management and it
>> can handle rogue client in proper fashion". Not in KV, and I guess not
>> in CZ as well.
>
> At least on intel the execlist stuff which is used for preemption can be
> used by both the cpu and the firmware scheduler. So we can actually
> preempt when doing cpu scheduling.
>
> It sounds like current amd hw doesn't have any preemption at all. And
> without preemption I don't think we should ever consider to allow
> userspace to directly submit stuff to the hw and overload. Imo the kernel
> _must_ sit in between and reject clients that don't behave. Of course you
> can only ever react (worst case with a gpu reset, there's code floating
> around for that on intel-gfx), but at least you can do something.
>
> If userspace has a direct submit path to the hw then this gets really
> tricky, if not impossible.
> -Daniel
>
Hi Daniel,
See the email I just sent to Jerome regarding preemption. Bottom line, in KV, we
can preempt running queues, except from the case of a stuck gpu kernel. In CZ,
this was solved.
So, in this regard, I don't think there is any difference between userspace
queues and ioctl.
Oded
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-22 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-17 13:57 [PATCH v2 00/25] AMDKFD kernel driver Oded Gabbay
2014-07-20 17:46 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-21 3:03 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-21 7:01 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-21 9:34 ` Christian König
2014-07-21 12:36 ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-21 13:39 ` Christian König
2014-07-21 14:12 ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-21 15:54 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-21 17:42 ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-21 18:14 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-21 18:36 ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-21 18:59 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-21 19:23 ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-21 19:28 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-21 21:56 ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-21 23:05 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-21 23:29 ` Bridgman, John
2014-07-21 23:36 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-22 8:05 ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-22 7:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-22 8:10 ` Oded Gabbay [this message]
2014-07-21 15:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-21 15:58 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-21 17:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-21 17:28 ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-21 18:22 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-21 18:41 ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-21 19:03 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-22 7:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-22 7:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-22 8:21 ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-22 8:19 ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-22 9:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-22 9:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-22 9:52 ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-22 11:15 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-23 6:50 ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-23 7:04 ` Christian König
2014-07-23 13:39 ` Bridgman, John
2014-07-23 14:56 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-23 19:49 ` Alex Deucher
2014-07-23 20:25 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-23 7:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-23 8:35 ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-23 13:33 ` Bridgman, John
2014-07-23 14:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-23 15:06 ` Bridgman, John
2014-07-23 15:12 ` Bridgman, John
[not found] ` <20140723135931.79541a86@jbarnes-desktop>
[not found] ` <D89D60253BB73A4E8C62F9FD18A939CA01067410@storexdag02.amd.com>
2014-07-23 22:01 ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-24 15:44 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-24 17:35 ` Alex Deucher
2014-07-24 18:47 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-24 18:57 ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-24 20:26 ` Jerome Glisse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53CE1C92.2070200@amd.com \
--to=oded.gabbay@amd.com \
--cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
--cc=Alexey.Skidanov@amd.com \
--cc=Andrew.Lewycky@amd.com \
--cc=John.Bridgman@amd.com \
--cc=Tom.Sellek@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=j.glisse@gmail.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=michel.daenzer@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox