From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755979AbaGVPzi (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:55:38 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f176.google.com ([209.85.213.176]:33499 "EHLO mail-ig0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755408AbaGVPzh (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:55:37 -0400 Message-ID: <53CE897F.4090308@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:55:43 -0500 From: Alex Elder User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Borislav Petkov CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, kay@vrfy.org, pmladek@suse.cz, john.stultz@linaro.org, jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] printk: more log flag simplification References: <1406037717-9670-1-git-send-email-elder@linaro.org> <20140722142456.GB10670@pd.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20140722142456.GB10670@pd.tnic> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/22/2014 09:24 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 09:01:55AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: >> This series eliminates the LOG_CONT entirely from the printk/log code. >> It builds on another series, posted earlier today: >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1791665.html >> This series was originally longer, but in review I was reminded >> that some of the simplifications I had done were not valid. >> >> The first patch exploits the fact that LOG_CONT and LOG_NEWLINE >> are inverses, and uses LOG_NEWLINE (or its negation) anywhere >> LOG_CONT is used. As a result, LOG_CONT is no longer needed, so >> it's eliminated. >> >> The second patch improves some comments and makes a few small >> code cleanups, now that it's gone through this transformation. > > This is getting ridiculous - you've been spamming me with printk patches > like crazy every day! I told you to wait a bit with a resend until > people have had a chance to review them, but you don't seem to care. > > Would you please remove me from your CC list? Yes. -Alex > Thank you. >