From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] futex: introduce an optimistic spinning futex
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:35:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53CEAEDA.9000704@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871tte3bjw.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
On 07/21/2014 12:45 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Andi Kleen<andi@firstfloor.org> writes:
>
>> Waiman Long<Waiman.Long@hp.com> writes:
>>
>>> This patch series introduces two new futex command codes to support
>>> a new optimistic spinning futex for implementing an exclusive lock
>>> primitive that should perform better than the same primitive using
>>> the wait-wake futex in cases where the lock owner is actively working
>>> instead of waiting for I/O completion.
>> How would you distinguish those two cases automatically?
> Also BTW traditionally the spinning was just done in user space.
>
> This would be always even more efficient, because it would
> even avoid the syscall entry path.
Spinning directly in userspace is useful if the critical section is
really short and the chance of heavy contention is small. However, if
the lock can be heavily contended and the critical section is not short,
these are the conditions where a spinning futex proposed by this patch
series can help.
-Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-22 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-21 15:24 [RFC PATCH 0/5] futex: introduce an optimistic spinning futex Waiman Long
2014-07-21 15:24 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] futex: add new exclusive lock & unlock command codes Waiman Long
2014-07-21 16:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-22 18:22 ` Waiman Long
2014-07-22 21:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-21 15:24 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] futex: add optimistic spinning to FUTEX_SPIN_LOCK Waiman Long
2014-07-21 17:15 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-07-22 18:46 ` Waiman Long
2014-07-21 20:17 ` Jason Low
2014-07-22 19:34 ` Waiman Long
2014-07-21 15:24 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] spinning futex: move a wakened task to spinning Waiman Long
2014-07-21 15:24 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] spinning futex: put waiting tasks in a sorted rbtree Waiman Long
2014-07-21 15:24 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] futex, doc: add a document on how to use the spinning futexes Waiman Long
2014-07-21 15:45 ` Randy Dunlap
2014-07-22 3:19 ` Waiman Long
2014-07-21 16:42 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] futex: introduce an optimistic spinning futex Andi Kleen
2014-07-21 16:45 ` Andi Kleen
2014-07-21 17:20 ` Darren Hart
[not found] ` <CFF29A00.9D44A%dvhart@linux.intel.com>
2014-07-21 17:41 ` Darren Hart
2014-07-21 20:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-21 21:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-21 21:31 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-21 21:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-21 22:41 ` Darren Hart
2014-07-22 1:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-22 1:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-07-22 2:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-07-22 3:06 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-07-22 7:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-22 8:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-22 8:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-22 9:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-22 20:25 ` Waiman Long
2014-07-22 20:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-22 20:21 ` Waiman Long
2014-07-22 21:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-22 0:32 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-07-22 7:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-21 21:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-21 18:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-22 18:35 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2014-07-22 18:28 ` Waiman Long
2014-07-23 4:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-07-23 6:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-23 7:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-07-23 7:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-23 7:39 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-07-23 7:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-21 21:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-07-21 21:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-22 19:36 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53CEAEDA.9000704@hp.com \
--to=waiman.long@hp.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox