public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@gmail.com>
To: "Klaus A. Kreil" <klaus.kreil@univie.ac.at>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unable to mount using overlayfs.v22 on kernel 3.15.5
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 08:14:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D0F89B.4090907@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53CEDA35.40301@univie.ac.at>

Klaus A. Kreil wrote:
> Hello list,
> I have just found out about this mailing list which obviously also 
> takes care of overlayfs.
>
> I have been a happy user of overlayfs for quiet some time using it to 
> propagate a shared r/o LVM ext4 lowerdir rootfs with a small r/w ext4 
> upperdir for a number of XEN domU guests. I started with overlayfs on 
> kernel version 3.11.7 (all on gentoo-hardened). Recently I have 
> switched from 3.13.10 (using overlayfs.v21) to 3.15.5 with overlayfs.v22.
>
> overlayfs.v22 seems to have changed insofar as there's a new parameter 
> workdir=/dir with dir required to be an empty directory on the same 
> filesystem as upperdir. So I have changed my initramfs to include that 
> parameter and have also created my /dir directory (named /.work, owned 
> by root:root and 0755 mode) on all my individual upperdir filesystems 
> for all of my XEN domUs.
>
> Now when I start the new kernel 3.15.5 with the modified init script 
> from the newly created initramfs, I am ending up in a rescue shell. 
> Both the upper and lower filesystem are (as expected) mounted 
> appropriately to /mnt/root_ro and /mnt/root_rw amd /mnt/root exists. 
> Howeverm, trying to combine those two filesystems on /mnt/root (as 
> before and regardless of whether used with or without the workdir= 
> parameter) fails with an error message as follows:
>
> # mount -t overlayfs overlayfs -o 
> lowerdir=/mnt/root_ro,upperdir=/mnt/root_rw,workdir=/.work /mnt/root
> mount: mounting overlayfs on /mnt/root failed: Invalid argument
>
> The error message stays the same regardless of where on the command 
> line the overlayfs "device" parameter appears. I can't see what's 
> wrong with the command line given that - with the exception of the 
> workdir=/.work part - the command has not changed from 3.13.10 
> (overlayfs.v21), therefore currently leaving me at loss.
>
> I would very much appreciate any help and support in tracking down 
> this unexpected issue.
>
> Regards Atom2
Klaus, I have run into similar problems...
What works for me:
Once you mount the upperdir /mnt/root_rw, create /mnt/root_rw/root and 
/mnt/root_rw/workdir and use these for overlayfs mountpoints.

Woody

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-24 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-22 21:40 unable to mount using overlayfs.v22 on kernel 3.15.5 Klaus A. Kreil
2014-07-24 12:14 ` Woody Suwalski [this message]
2014-07-24 13:48   ` Klaus A. Kreil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53D0F89B.4090907@gmail.com \
    --to=terraluna977@gmail.com \
    --cc=klaus.kreil@univie.ac.at \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox