The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkp@01.org
Subject: [LKP] [net] 11ef7a8996d: +27.3% netperf.Throughput_Mbps
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:31:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D1F9B5.8050500@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53d1f50b.CEZoGFBjN5Kgc+zm%fengguang.wu@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3660 bytes --]

FYI, we noticed the below changes on

commit 11ef7a8996d5d433c9cd75d80651297eccbf6d42 ("net: Performance fix for process_backlog")

test case: lkp-t410/netperf/300s-200%-10K-SCTP_STREAM_MANY

68b7107b62983f2  11ef7a8996d5d433c9cd75d80  
---------------  -------------------------  
      1023 ~ 3%     +27.3%       1302 ~ 0%  TOTAL netperf.Throughput_Mbps
      0.72 ~10%     -91.4%       0.06 ~23%  TOTAL turbostat.%c3
     13385 ~12%     -92.6%        987 ~12%  TOTAL cpuidle.C6-NHM.usage
     22745 ~10%     -95.5%       1016 ~40%  TOTAL cpuidle.C3-NHM.usage
  42675736 ~12%     -84.6%    6571705 ~19%  TOTAL cpuidle.C6-NHM.time
     88342 ~11%     -82.1%      15811 ~ 9%  TOTAL softirqs.SCHED
  19148006 ~12%     -95.7%     821873 ~27%  TOTAL cpuidle.C3-NHM.time
    439.94 ~10%     -77.5%      99.05 ~ 5%  TOTAL uptime.idle
      1.35 ~ 6%     -65.8%       0.46 ~24%  TOTAL turbostat.%c6
         4 ~23%    +114.3%          9 ~ 0%  TOTAL vmstat.procs.r
      1680 ~ 3%     +40.4%       2359 ~ 3%  TOTAL proc-vmstat.nr_alloc_batch
    447921 ~ 4%     +36.2%     610047 ~ 0%  TOTAL softirqs.TIMER
      9.09 ~ 9%     +27.6%      11.60 ~ 8%  TOTAL perf-profile.cpu-cycles.memcpy.sctp_outq_flush.sctp_outq_uncork.sctp_cmd_interpreter.sctp_do_sm
   2350916 ~ 4%     +35.4%    3184088 ~ 0%  TOTAL proc-vmstat.pgalloc_dma
      7.82 ~ 9%     +24.1%       9.71 ~ 4%  TOTAL perf-profile.cpu-cycles.copy_user_generic_string.sctp_user_addto_chunk.sctp_datamsg_from_user.sctp_sendmsg.inet_sendmsg
  38837537 ~ 3%     +27.1%   49358639 ~ 0%  TOTAL proc-vmstat.numa_local
  38837537 ~ 3%     +27.1%   49358639 ~ 0%  TOTAL proc-vmstat.numa_hit
     50216 ~ 1%     +17.0%      58745 ~ 6%  TOTAL softirqs.RCU
      1.41 ~ 4%     +11.6%       1.58 ~ 1%  TOTAL perf-profile.cpu-cycles.get_page_from_freelist.__alloc_pages_nodemask.alloc_kmem_pages_node.kmalloc_large_node.__kmalloc_node_track_caller
     48539 ~ 1%     -25.5%      36171 ~ 1%  TOTAL vmstat.system.cs
     75.64 ~ 4%     +30.6%      98.82 ~ 0%  TOTAL turbostat.%c0
      3949 ~ 2%     +13.4%       4478 ~ 0%  TOTAL vmstat.system.in

Legend:
	~XX%    - stddev percent
	[+-]XX% - change percent


                                  vmstat.system.cs

  52000 ++------------------------------------------------------------------+
  50000 ++  *      .*   *.                   **        *. *  *.             |
        | .* + *.**  *. : **.* .* .**.**. * +  +    *.*  * + : * .**. *.  .**
  48000 **    *        *      *  *       * *    * .*        *   *    *  **  |
  46000 ++                                       *                          |
        |                                                                   |
  44000 ++                                                                  |
  42000 ++                                                                  |
  40000 ++                                                                  |
        |                                                                   |
  38000 +O  O                      O                                        |
  36000 O+    O  O   O  O OO OO OO  O  O   O  O  O OO  O OO O               |
        |  O   O  O O  O                  O           O                     |
  34000 ++                            O  O   O  O                           |
  32000 ++------------------------------------------------------------------+


	[*] bisect-good sample
	[O] bisect-bad  sample


Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.

Thanks,
Aaron

[-- Attachment #2: reproduce --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 711 bytes --]

echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/cpufreq/scaling_governor
netserver
netperf -t SCTP_STREAM_MANY -c -C -l 300 -- -m 10K
netperf -t SCTP_STREAM_MANY -c -C -l 300 -- -m 10K
netperf -t SCTP_STREAM_MANY -c -C -l 300 -- -m 10K
netperf -t SCTP_STREAM_MANY -c -C -l 300 -- -m 10K
netperf -t SCTP_STREAM_MANY -c -C -l 300 -- -m 10K
netperf -t SCTP_STREAM_MANY -c -C -l 300 -- -m 10K
netperf -t SCTP_STREAM_MANY -c -C -l 300 -- -m 10K
netperf -t SCTP_STREAM_MANY -c -C -l 300 -- -m 10K


       reply	other threads:[~2014-07-25  6:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <53d1f50b.CEZoGFBjN5Kgc+zm%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
2014-07-25  6:31 ` Aaron Lu [this message]
2014-07-25  6:37   ` [LKP] [net] 11ef7a8996d: +27.3% netperf.Throughput_Mbps Tom Herbert
2014-07-25  6:44     ` Aaron Lu
2014-07-25  6:48     ` David Miller
2014-07-25  6:49       ` Aaron Lu
2014-07-25  7:16         ` Tom Herbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53D1F9B5.8050500@intel.com \
    --to=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@01.org \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox