From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jet Chen <jet.chen@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp@01.org
Subject: [LKP] [rcu] c0f489d2c6f: -1.5% netperf.Throughput_tps
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:45:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D1FD0E.4080406@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53d1f486.t70cWJ/Ilm6Y3o5/%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 12008 bytes --]
FYI, we noticed the below changes on
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
commit c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec925eb858727dc7b ("rcu: Bind grace-period kthreads to non-NO_HZ_FULL CPUs")
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
12654 ~ 0% -1.5% 12470 ~ 0% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
12654 ~ 0% -1.5% 12470 ~ 0% TOTAL netperf.Throughput_tps
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
1050 ~ 4% -91.4% 90 ~23% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
1050 ~ 4% -91.4% 90 ~23% TOTAL cpuidle.POLL.usage
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
53785432 ~ 4% -77.8% 11927078 ~26% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
53785432 ~ 4% -77.8% 11927078 ~26% TOTAL cpuidle.C1E-IVT.time
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
5674 ~30% +1060.9% 65880 ~ 3% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
5674 ~30% +1060.9% 65880 ~ 3% TOTAL numa-vmstat.node0.numa_other
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
851366 ~ 8% -74.4% 218296 ~24% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
851366 ~ 8% -74.4% 218296 ~24% TOTAL cpuidle.C1E-IVT.usage
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
8045967 ~28% -81.9% 1454789 ~14% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-128K
6021385 ~41% -70.5% 1773953 ~18% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-512K
14067352 ~34% -77.0% 3228743 ~16% TOTAL cpuidle.C1-SNB.time
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
78355 ~ 2% -77.0% 18022 ~11% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
78355 ~ 2% -77.0% 18022 ~11% TOTAL numa-vmstat.node1.numa_other
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
0.16 ~11% -72.5% 0.04 ~11% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
0.16 ~11% -72.5% 0.04 ~11% TOTAL turbostat.%c3
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
237 ~ 9% +169.4% 640 ~ 2% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-128K
197 ~11% +177.3% 546 ~ 4% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-512K
435 ~10% +173.0% 1187 ~ 3% TOTAL cpuidle.C3-SNB.usage
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
32364085 ~ 6% -62.3% 12189943 ~16% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
32364085 ~ 6% -62.3% 12189943 ~16% TOTAL cpuidle.C3-IVT.time
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
10134346 ~ 1% -55.0% 4563107 ~10% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
10134346 ~ 1% -55.0% 4563107 ~10% TOTAL cpuidle.C6-IVT.usage
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
82079 ~ 6% +176.9% 227278 ~23% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-128K
82079 ~ 6% +176.9% 227278 ~23% TOTAL cpuidle.C3-SNB.time
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
659858 ~ 5% -49.7% 332152 ~19% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
659858 ~ 5% -49.7% 332152 ~19% TOTAL cpuidle.C3-IVT.usage
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
8031 ~20% +67.1% 13418 ~ 2% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-128K
7254 ~ 7% +83.8% 13331 ~ 1% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-512K
15285 ~14% +75.0% 26750 ~ 1% TOTAL softirqs.RCU
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
37.34 ~ 1% -32.6% 25.17 ~ 3% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
1.04 ~17% -51.2% 0.51 ~ 4% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-128K
0.74 ~27% -48.8% 0.38 ~ 6% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-512K
39.12 ~ 1% -33.4% 26.06 ~ 3% TOTAL turbostat.%c1
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
512 ~11% -32.5% 345 ~18% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
512 ~11% -32.5% 345 ~18% TOTAL slabinfo.kmem_cache.num_objs
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
512 ~11% -32.5% 345 ~18% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
512 ~11% -32.5% 345 ~18% TOTAL slabinfo.kmem_cache.active_objs
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
8107 ~ 2% -28.5% 5798 ~ 9% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
8107 ~ 2% -28.5% 5798 ~ 9% TOTAL proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults_local
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
622 ~ 9% -26.8% 455 ~14% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
622 ~ 9% -26.8% 455 ~14% TOTAL slabinfo.kmem_cache_node.active_objs
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
8610 ~ 2% -28.2% 6180 ~12% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
8610 ~ 2% -28.2% 6180 ~12% TOTAL proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
640 ~ 8% -26.0% 473 ~13% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
640 ~ 8% -26.0% 473 ~13% TOTAL slabinfo.kmem_cache_node.num_objs
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
8876 ~ 2% -27.2% 6465 ~11% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
8876 ~ 2% -27.2% 6465 ~11% TOTAL proc-vmstat.numa_pte_updates
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
29.02 ~ 1% +40.6% 40.81 ~ 2% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
29.02 ~ 1% +40.6% 40.81 ~ 2% TOTAL turbostat.%c6
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
1223070 ~11% -25.6% 909702 ~ 5% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-512K
1223070 ~11% -25.6% 909702 ~ 5% TOTAL cpuidle.C1E-SNB.time
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
1278 ~ 6% +38.0% 1764 ~ 4% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-128K
1257 ~ 5% +30.6% 1641 ~ 4% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-512K
2535 ~ 6% +34.3% 3406 ~ 4% TOTAL cpuidle.C1E-SNB.usage
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
2944 ~12% -21.2% 2319 ~13% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-512K
2944 ~12% -21.2% 2319 ~13% TOTAL slabinfo.anon_vma.active_objs
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
440 ~ 9% +18.5% 521 ~10% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
440 ~ 9% +18.5% 521 ~10% TOTAL numa-vmstat.node1.nr_page_table_pages
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
1751 ~ 9% +18.6% 2076 ~10% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
1751 ~ 9% +18.6% 2076 ~10% TOTAL numa-meminfo.node1.PageTables
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
2.828e+09 ~ 0% -14.9% 2.407e+09 ~ 1% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
2.828e+09 ~ 0% -14.9% 2.407e+09 ~ 1% TOTAL cpuidle.C1-IVT.time
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
966 ~ 2% -13.0% 840 ~ 3% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-128K
949 ~ 2% -10.6% 848 ~ 1% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-512K
1915 ~ 2% -11.8% 1688 ~ 2% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-96.active_objs
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
966 ~ 2% -13.0% 840 ~ 3% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-128K
949 ~ 2% -10.6% 848 ~ 1% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-512K
1915 ~ 2% -11.8% 1688 ~ 2% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-96.num_objs
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
41345 ~ 1% +12.5% 46521 ~ 0% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-512K
41345 ~ 1% +12.5% 46521 ~ 0% TOTAL cpuidle.C6-SNB.usage
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
13053 ~ 1% +12.0% 14613 ~ 4% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
13053 ~ 1% +12.0% 14613 ~ 4% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-192.active_objs
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
13053 ~ 1% +12.1% 14629 ~ 4% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
13053 ~ 1% +12.1% 14629 ~ 4% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-192.num_objs
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
2.02 ~ 3% -8.6% 1.85 ~ 5% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
2.02 ~ 3% -8.6% 1.85 ~ 5% TOTAL perf-profile.cpu-cycles.intel_idle.cpuidle_enter_state.cpuidle_enter.cpu_idle_loop.cpu_startup_entry
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
8226 ~ 2% -88.4% 957 ~22% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-128K
8291 ~ 1% -91.1% 736 ~24% lkp-sb02/pigz/25%-512K
16518 ~ 2% -89.7% 1694 ~23% TOTAL time.involuntary_context_switches
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
766220 ~ 1% -7.3% 709976 ~ 2% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
766220 ~ 1% -7.3% 709976 ~ 2% TOTAL vmstat.system.cs
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
122 ~ 0% -4.4% 117 ~ 0% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
122 ~ 0% -4.4% 117 ~ 0% TOTAL turbostat.Cor_W
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
153 ~ 0% -3.5% 148 ~ 0% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
153 ~ 0% -3.5% 148 ~ 0% TOTAL turbostat.Pkg_W
abaa93d9e1de2c2 c0f489d2c6fec8994c642c2ec
--------------- -------------------------
33.48 ~ 0% +1.5% 33.97 ~ 0% ivb43/netperf/300s-25%-TCP_CRR
33.48 ~ 0% +1.5% 33.97 ~ 0% TOTAL turbostat.%c0
Legend:
~XX% - stddev percent
[+-]XX% - change percent
time.involuntary_context_switches
9000 ++--------------*----------------------------------------------------+
|.*..*.*.*.. .* + .*.*.*..*.*.*..*.*. .*.*.*..*.*.*..*.*.*.*..*.*
8000 *+ * *. *.*. |
7000 ++ |
| |
6000 ++ |
5000 ++ |
| |
4000 ++ |
3000 ++ |
| |
2000 ++ |
1000 ++ O O O |
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O |
0 ++---------------------------------O-O-------------------------------+
[*] bisect-good sample
[O] bisect-bad sample
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
Thanks,
Aaron
[-- Attachment #2: reproduce --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 293 bytes --]
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/cpufreq/scaling_governor
next parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-25 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <53d1f486.t70cWJ/Ilm6Y3o5/%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
2014-07-25 6:45 ` Aaron Lu [this message]
2014-07-25 7:35 ` [LKP] [rcu] c0f489d2c6f: -1.5% netperf.Throughput_tps Mike Galbraith
2014-07-25 8:05 ` Aaron Lu
2014-07-25 9:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-07-25 14:31 ` Aaron Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53D1FD0E.4080406@intel.com \
--to=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=jet.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox