From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Two-phase seccomp and x86 tracing changes
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:45:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D6E07F.7090806@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jLjmHczeQiJN1Q+aGQKn_B+08FEXHWxjku6QedkGDhDTg@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/28/2014 04:42 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:34 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>> On 07/28/2014 04:29 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:59 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>>>> On 07/23/2014 12:20 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks like patches 1-4 have landed here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/log/?h=seccomp/fastpath
>>>>>
>>>>> hpa, what's the route forward for the x86 part?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I guess I should discuss this with Kees to figure out what makes most
>>>> sense. In the meantime, could you address Oleg's question?
>>>
>>> Since the x86 parts depend on the seccomp parts, I'm happy if you
>>> carry them instead of having them land from my tree. Otherwise I'm
>>> open to how to coordinate timing.
>>>
>>
>> You mean for me to carry the seccomp part as well?
>
> If that makes sense as far as the coordination, that's fine with me.
> Otherwise I'm not sure how x86 can build without having the seccomp
> changes in your tree.
>
Exactly. What I guess I'll do is set up a separate tip branch for this,
pull your branch into it, and then put the x86 patches on top. Does
that make sense for everyone?
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-28 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-22 1:49 [PATCH v3 0/8] Two-phase seccomp and x86 tracing changes Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22 1:49 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] seccomp,x86,arm,mips,s390: Remove nr parameter from secure_computing Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22 1:49 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] seccomp: Refactor the filter callback and the API Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22 1:49 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] seccomp: Allow arch code to provide seccomp_data Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22 1:49 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] seccomp: Document two-phase seccomp and arch-provided seccomp_data Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22 1:53 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] x86,x32,audit: Fix x32's AUDIT_ARCH wrt audit Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22 1:53 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] x86: Split syscall_trace_enter into two phases Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-28 17:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-28 18:58 ` TIF_NOHZ can escape nonhz mask? (Was: [PATCH v3 6/8] x86: Split syscall_trace_enter into two phases) Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-28 19:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-29 17:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-30 16:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-30 17:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-31 0:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-31 16:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-31 17:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-31 18:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-31 18:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-31 18:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-31 19:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-02 17:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 12:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-28 20:23 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] x86: Split syscall_trace_enter into two phases Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-29 16:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-29 17:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-29 17:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-29 17:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-29 18:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-29 18:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-29 18:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-22 1:53 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] x86_64,entry: Treat regs->ax the same in fastpath and slowpath syscalls Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22 1:53 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] x86_64,entry: Use split-phase syscall_trace_enter for 64-bit syscalls Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22 19:37 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] Two-phase seccomp and x86 tracing changes Kees Cook
2014-07-23 19:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-28 17:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-28 23:29 ` Kees Cook
2014-07-28 23:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-28 23:42 ` Kees Cook
2014-07-28 23:45 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2014-07-28 23:54 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53D6E07F.7090806@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).