From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754546AbaG3PFq (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:05:46 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:36988 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753822AbaG3PFp (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:05:45 -0400 Message-ID: <53D909C3.9050205@canonical.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:05:39 +0100 From: Colin Ian King User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Fleming , Borislav Petkov CC: Prarit Bhargava , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lszubowi@redhat.com, Matt Fleming , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: print debug values in Kib not MB References: <1406653761-3884-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com> <20140729222932.GA17481@pd.tnic> <20140730144803.GB15082@console-pimps.org> In-Reply-To: <20140730144803.GB15082@console-pimps.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 30/07/14 15:48, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul, at 12:29:32AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 01:09:21PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote: >>> The current debug print in EFI does >>> >>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem84: type=3, attr=0xf, range=[0x00000000645b5000-0x00000000645fb000) (0MB) >>> >>> and rounds off the size to 0MB and isn't very useful. We should print this in >>> Kib. After applying this patch we get better info with >>> >>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem84: type=3, attr=0xf, range=[0x00000000645b5000-0x00000000645fb000) (280kiB) >> >> Turning this into kiB unconditionally won't always work ok: >> >> First of all, there might be something which parses that output so I'd >> make sure I'm not breaking that. Maybe fwts... Matt will know. > > I'm not aware of anything that parses the dmesg output, but I'm > including Colin in case he has any insight. > That won't break fwts. Colin