From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753608AbaGaKsW (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2014 06:48:22 -0400 Received: from hqemgate14.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.143]:5823 "EHLO hqemgate14.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752243AbaGaKsU (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2014 06:48:20 -0400 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp07.nvidia.com on Thu, 31 Jul 2014 03:35:58 -0700 Message-ID: <53DA1EF0.7060207@nvidia.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:48:16 +0300 From: Mikko Perttunen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Warren CC: Andrew Bresticker , Peter De Schrijver , Prashant Gaikwad , Mike Turquette , Thierry Reding , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] of: Add Tegra124 EMC bindings References: <1405088313-20048-1-git-send-email-mperttunen@nvidia.com> <1405088313-20048-6-git-send-email-mperttunen@nvidia.com> <53CD860B.7030800@wwwdotorg.org> <53CE9514.1050903@wwwdotorg.org> <53CEA093.6060106@wwwdotorg.org> <53D75B90.7050501@nvidia.com> <53D7C276.2080204@wwwdotorg.org> In-Reply-To: <53D7C276.2080204@wwwdotorg.org> X-NVConfidentiality: public Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29/07/14 18:49, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 07/29/2014 02:30 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote: >> Looks like the TRM doesn't document this either. I'll add an option >> ("nvidia,short-ram-code" ?) for the next version. > > Using the 2-bit RAM code field as the RAM code is normal operation, so I > wouldn't call this "short". > > Using the 2-bit boot device code field as extra RAM code bits is > non-standard. > > I would suggest nvidia,use-4-bit-ram-code or > nvidia,use-boot-device-code-as-ram-code-msbs(!) as the property. Sure. > > I see that the TRM implies the whole 4-bit field is RAM code, rather > than there being 2 separate 2-bit fields for RAM code and boot device > code. Can you please file a bug against the TRM to document this > correctly? (The details of which bits are which are visible on the > Jetson TK1 schematics for example). Yes, I'll file a bug. - Mikko