From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peifeiyue@huawei.com,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kprobes: arm: enable OPTPROBES for arm 32
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 11:07:30 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E430E2.3040709@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53E42704.3090909@huawei.com>
(2014/08/08 10:25), Wang Nan wrote:
> On 2014/8/7 14:59, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2014/08/06 15:24), Wang Nan wrote:
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static void
>>>>> +optimized_callback(struct optimized_kprobe *op, struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + unsigned long flags;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + regs->ARM_pc = (unsigned long)op->kp.addr;
>>>>> + regs->ARM_ORIG_r0 = ~0UL;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +
>>>>> + local_irq_save(flags);
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * This is possible if op is under delayed unoptimizing.
>>>>> + * We need simulate the replaced instruction.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if (kprobe_disabled(&op->kp)) {
>>>>> + struct kprobe *p = &op->kp;
>>>>> + op->kp.ainsn.insn_singlestep(p->opcode, &p->ainsn, regs);
>>>>> + } else {
>>>>> + kprobe_handler(regs);
>>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> You don't need brace "{}" for one statement.
>>>> By the way, why don't you call opt_pre_handler()?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I use kprobe_handler because it handles instruction emulation.
>>>
>>> In addition, I'm not very sure whether skipping the complex checks
>>> in kprobe_handler() is safe or not.
>>
>> That seems to do same thing on x86. Then you should do something like
>> the optimized_callback() on x86 as below.
>>
>> static void
>> optimized_callback(struct optimized_kprobe *op, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> {
>> struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
>> unsigned long flags;
>>
>> local_irq_save(flags);
>> if (kprobe_running()) {
>> kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(&op->kp);
>
> In this case we still need a singlestep, right?
Ah, right! and if the singlestep requires setting up the regs->ARM_pc,
we also do that before this check. So the right code will be;
static void
optimized_callback(struct optimized_kprobe *op, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
unsigned long flags;
local_irq_save(flags);
/* Save skipped registers */
regs->ARM_pc = (unsigned long)op->kp.addr;
regs->ARM_ORIG_r0 = ~0UL;
if (kprobe_running())
kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(&op->kp);
else {
__this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, &op->kp);
kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
opt_pre_handler(&op->kp, regs);
__this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, NULL);
}
op->kp.ainsn.insn_singlestep(op->kp.opcode, &op->kp.ainsn, regs);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
Thank you,
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-08 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-05 7:28 [RFC PATCH] kprobes: arm: enable OPTPROBES for arm 32 Wang Nan
2014-08-06 4:44 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-06 6:24 ` Wang Nan
2014-08-07 6:59 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-08 1:25 ` Wang Nan
2014-08-08 2:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2014-08-06 13:36 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2014-08-06 13:40 ` Wang Nan
2014-08-06 14:23 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2014-08-06 22:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-08-06 22:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53E430E2.3040709@hitachi.com \
--to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=peifeiyue@huawei.com \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox