From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753328AbaHKMcF (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:32:05 -0400 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:16846 "EHLO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753213AbaHKMcC (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:32:02 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,841,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="161219350" Message-ID: <53E8B7BF.2020107@citrix.com> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 13:31:59 +0100 From: Zoltan Kiss User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Hemminger CC: David Vrabel , Wei Liu , "Ian Campbell" , , , Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netback: Turn off the carrier if the guest is not able to receive References: <1406749849-4356-1-git-send-email-zoltan.kiss@citrix.com> <1406749849-4356-2-git-send-email-zoltan.kiss@citrix.com> <53DF8C24.6030709@citrix.com> <53DFA30E.2000301@citrix.com> <20140808093356.04d7228b@haswell.linuxnetplumber.net> In-Reply-To: <20140808093356.04d7228b@haswell.linuxnetplumber.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DLP: MIA1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/08/14 17:33, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > This idea of bouncing carrier is wrong. If guest is flow blocked you don't > want to toggle carrier. That will cause problems because applications that are > looking for carrier transistions like routing daemons will be notified. > > If running a routing daemon this will also lead to link flapping which > is very bad and cause lots of other work for peer routing daemons. > > Carrier is not a suitable flow control mechanism. > Hi, Indeed, I also had some concerns about using carrier state to solve this problem, as the notifier can kick a lot of things, and flapping is not impossible. That's why the frontend has 10 seconds by default to do something. Practice shows that if a frontend can't do any receive work for that time, it is unlikely it will be able to do it soon. So worst case carrier flapping can happen only in every 10 seconds, I think that's manageable. I think the majority of the users have simple bridged setups where this carrier change doesn't start any expensive operation. The reason we choose carrier change for this purpose because we needed something which ditched everything in QDisc and made sure nothing will be queued up there until there is a chance we can transmit to the guest. Calling dev_deactivate straight away seemed less appropriate. Regards, Zoltan