From: "Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
user-mode-linux-devel
<user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
sahne@0x90.at
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] "resource: provide new functions to walk through resources" breaks UML
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 21:25:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E91894.3060501@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140811184401.GE1863@redhat.com>
On 08/11/2014 08:44 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Can you please give the attached patch a try and see if it fixes the UML
> issue.
>
> I noticed that previous code had a for() loop which will not execute
> if p was null. I have resorted back to same code now.
>
> Thanks
> Vivek
>
>
> ---
> kernel/resource.c | 11 ++++-------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/resource.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/resource.c 2014-08-11 13:36:19.942423192 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/resource.c 2014-08-11 13:50:20.529387653 -0400
> @@ -351,15 +351,12 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(struct re
> end = res->end;
> BUG_ON(start >= end);
>
> - read_lock(&resource_lock);
> -
> - if (first_level_children_only) {
> - p = iomem_resource.child;
> + if (first_level_children_only)
> sibling_only = true;
> - } else
> - p = &iomem_resource;
>
> - while ((p = next_resource(p, sibling_only))) {
> + read_lock(&resource_lock);
> +
> + for (p = iomem_resource.child; p; p = next_resource(p, sibling_only)) {
> if (p->flags != res->flags)
> continue;
> if (name && strcmp(p->name, name))
>
At least at my system (32 bit x86) the patch seems to work (applied on top of v3.16-10473-gc8d6637)
--
Toralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-11 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-10 16:56 "resource: provide new functions to walk through resources" breaks UML Richard Weinberger
2014-08-11 12:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-11 12:25 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-08-11 18:44 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-11 19:18 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-08-11 19:25 ` Toralf Förster [this message]
2014-08-11 19:48 ` Daniel Walter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53E91894.3060501@gmx.de \
--to=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sahne@0x90.at \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox