public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkp@01.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [sched] 143e1e28cb4: +17.9% aim7.jobs-per-min, -9.7% hackbench.throughput
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 09:29:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E99117.9010500@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140811133352.GC9918@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 08/11/2014 07:03 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> Now I think I see why this is; we've reduced load balancing frequency
> significantly on this machine due to:

We have also changed the value of busy_factor to 32 from 64 across all
domains. This would contribute to increased frequency of load balancing?

Regards
Preeti U Murthy
> 
> 
> -#define SD_SIBLING_INIT (struct sched_domain) {                                \
> -       .min_interval           = 1,                                    \
> -       .max_interval           = 2,                                    \
> 
> 
> -#define SD_MC_INIT (struct sched_domain) {                             \
> -       .min_interval           = 1,                                    \
> -       .max_interval           = 4,                                    \
> 
> 
> -#define SD_CPU_INIT (struct sched_domain) {                            \
> -       .min_interval           = 1,                                    \
> -       .max_interval           = 4,                                    \
> 
> 
>         *sd = (struct sched_domain){
>                 .min_interval           = sd_weight,
>                 .max_interval           = 2*sd_weight,
> 
> Which both increased the min and max value significantly for all domains
> involved.
> 
> That said; I think we might want to do something like the below; I can
> imagine decreasing load balancing too much will negatively impact other
> workloads.
> 
> Maybe slightly modified to make sure the first domain has a min_interval
> of 1.
> 
> ---
>  kernel/sched/core.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 1211575a2208..67ed5d854da1 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -6049,8 +6049,8 @@ sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl, int cpu)
>  		sd_flags &= ~TOPOLOGY_SD_FLAGS;
>  
>  	*sd = (struct sched_domain){
> -		.min_interval		= sd_weight,
> -		.max_interval		= 2*sd_weight,
> +		.min_interval		= max(1, sd_weight/2),
> +		.max_interval		= sd_weight,
>  		.busy_factor		= 32,
>  		.imbalance_pct		= 125,
>  
> @@ -6076,7 +6076,7 @@ sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl, int cpu)
>  					,
>  
>  		.last_balance		= jiffies,
> -		.balance_interval	= sd_weight,
> +		.balance_interval	= max(1, sd_weight/2),
>  		.smt_gain		= 0,
>  		.max_newidle_lb_cost	= 0,
>  		.next_decay_max_lb_cost	= jiffies,
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-12  3:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-10  4:41 [sched] 143e1e28cb4: +17.9% aim7.jobs-per-min, -9.7% hackbench.throughput Fengguang Wu
2014-08-10  7:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-10 10:54   ` Fengguang Wu
2014-08-10 15:05     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-10 15:16       ` Ingo Molnar
2014-08-11  1:23       ` Fengguang Wu
2014-08-12 14:57         ` kodiak furr
2014-08-11 13:33     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-12  3:59       ` Preeti U Murthy [this message]
2014-08-12  6:41         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-12 14:30       ` Fengguang Wu
2014-08-25 13:47       ` Vincent Guittot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53E99117.9010500@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@01.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox