From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751493AbaHLFBo (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2014 01:01:44 -0400 Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:41944 "EHLO mtaout24.012.net.il" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750765AbaHLFBn (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2014 01:01:43 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:01:41 +0300 From: Oren Twaig Subject: x86: vmalloc and THP X-012-Sender: ira_oren@012.net.il To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: "Shai Fultheim (Shai@ScaleMP.com)" Message-id: <53E99FB5.1020506@scalemp.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 140811-1, 08/11/2014), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Does memory allocated using vmalloc() will be mapped using huge pages either directly or later by THP ? If not, is there any fast way to change this behavior ? Maybe by changing the granularity/alignment of such allocations to allow such mapping ? Thanks, Oren Twaig. --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com