From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs"
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:31:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E9DEDB.1080608@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53E8DD8D.3060500@zytor.com>
On 08/11/2014 05:13 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/11/2014 08:08 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> No, in *human language*. What does the DW_CFA_def_cfa_expression
>>> actually aim to accomplish? If you don't know the innards of the DWARF
>>> spec, the whole thing might as well be Hungarian.
>>
>> Just like the other DW_CFA_def_cfa_* ones it sets the current
>> frame address (CFA), just not via one of the pre-canned shortcuts,
>> but via an expression (in the case here de-referencing the stack
>> pointer to read the top of stack, and then adding the necessary
>> offset). So it indeed is similar enough to other .cfi_* annotations we
>> use without further comments.
>>
>
> Actually, what you had inside the parenteses there is actually a
> half-decent comment. I'm going to pretend the rest of this wasn't posted.
Jan, Pater, does this look correct _and_ human-understandable?
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -652,10 +652,14 @@ END(interrupt)
cmovzq PER_CPU_VAR(irq_stack_ptr),%rsp
CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rsi
pushq %rsi
+ /*
+ * For debugger:
+ * "CFA (Current Frame Address) is the value on stack + offset"
+ */
CFI_ESCAPE 0x0f /* DW_CFA_def_cfa_expression */, 6, \
- 0x77 /* DW_OP_breg7 */, 0, \
+ 0x77 /* DW_OP_breg7 (rsp) */, 0, \
0x06 /* DW_OP_deref */, \
- 0x08 /* DW_OP_const1u */, SS+8-RBP, \
+ 0x08 /* DW_OP_const1u */, SIZEOF_PTREGS-RBP, \
0x22 /* DW_OP_plus */
/* We entered an interrupt context - irqs are off: */
TRACE_IRQS_OFF
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-12 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-01 14:48 [PATCH 1/5] x86: entry_64.S: delete unused code Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: open-code register save/restore in trace_hardirqs thunks Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: entry_64.S: fold SAVE_ARGS_IRQ macro into its sole user Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 18:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs" Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 17:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-04 14:28 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-04 14:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 15:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 21:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-04 21:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-05 10:35 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-05 14:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-05 15:17 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-05 23:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-07 9:54 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 18:09 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-01 18:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-01 18:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-01 22:11 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 22:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-02 21:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-02 21:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-02 21:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-01 22:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-01 23:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-04 3:03 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-04 7:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-11 0:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-11 8:40 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 9:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-11 9:31 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 13:26 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-11 14:17 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 14:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-11 15:08 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 15:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-12 9:31 ` Denys Vlasenko [this message]
2014-08-12 9:50 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86: mass removal of ARGOFFSET Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: entry_64.S: delete unused code Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53E9DEDB.1080608@redhat.com \
--to=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).