From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
To: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
x86@kernel.org, toshi.kani@hp.com, imammedo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] X86/CPU: Avoid 100ms sleep for cpu offline during S3
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 07:36:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E9FC39.1030700@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407828667-14316-1-git-send-email-tianyu.lan@intel.com>
On 08/12/2014 03:31 AM, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> With some bad kernel configures, cpu offline consumes more than 100ms
> during S3. This because native_cpu_die() would fall into 100ms
> sleep when cpu idle loop thread marked cpu state to DEAD slower. It's
> timing related issue. What native_cpu_die() does is that poll cpu
> state and wait for 100ms if cpu state hasn't been marked to DEAD.
> The 100ms sleep doesn't make sense. To avoid such long sleep, this
> patch is to add struct completion to each cpu, wait for the completion
> in the native_cpu_die() and wakeup the completion when the cpu state is
> marked to DEAD.
>
> Tested on the Intel Xeon server with 48 cores, Ivbridge and Haswell laptops.
> the times of cpu offline on these machines are reduced from more than 100ms
> to less than 5ms. The system suspend time reduces 2.3s on the servers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Tested across a few systems of various sizes and configurations (multi-socket,
single-socket, no hyper threading, etc.). No issues seen.
Tested-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
P.
> ---
> Change since V1:
> Remove redundant empty line and correct some code styple issues.
>
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> index edf80bb..bc65e42 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,8 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(cpumask_var_t, cpu_llc_shared_map);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct cpuinfo_x86, cpu_info);
> EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_info);
>
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct completion, die_complete);
> +
> atomic_t init_deasserted;
>
> /*
> @@ -1331,7 +1333,7 @@ int native_cpu_disable(void)
> return ret;
>
> clear_local_APIC();
> -
> + init_completion(&per_cpu(die_complete, smp_processor_id()));
> cpu_disable_common();
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1339,18 +1341,14 @@ int native_cpu_disable(void)
> void native_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> /* We don't do anything here: idle task is faking death itself. */
> - unsigned int i;
> + wait_for_completion_timeout(&per_cpu(die_complete, cpu), HZ);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
> - /* They ack this in play_dead by setting CPU_DEAD */
> - if (per_cpu(cpu_state, cpu) == CPU_DEAD) {
> - if (system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING)
> - pr_info("CPU %u is now offline\n", cpu);
> - return;
> - }
> - msleep(100);
> - }
> - pr_err("CPU %u didn't die...\n", cpu);
> + /* They ack this in play_dead by setting CPU_DEAD */
> + if (per_cpu(cpu_state, cpu) == CPU_DEAD) {
> + if (system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING)
> + pr_info("CPU %u is now offline\n", cpu);
> + } else
> + pr_err("CPU %u didn't die...\n", cpu);
> }
>
> void play_dead_common(void)
> @@ -1362,6 +1360,7 @@ void play_dead_common(void)
> mb();
> /* Ack it */
> __this_cpu_write(cpu_state, CPU_DEAD);
> + complete(&per_cpu(die_complete, smp_processor_id()));
>
> /*
> * With physical CPU hotplug, we should halt the cpu
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-12 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-04 8:59 [PATCH] X86/CPU: Avoid 100ms sleep for cpu offline during S3 Lan Tianyu
2014-08-04 10:23 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <53E04457.2060507@intel.com>
2014-08-05 7:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-05 9:29 ` Lan Tianyu
2014-08-06 11:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-06 13:13 ` Lan, Tianyu
2014-08-06 13:57 ` Gene Heskett
2014-08-07 8:47 ` Lan Tianyu
2014-08-07 10:23 ` Gene Heskett
2014-08-06 16:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-07 8:56 ` Lan Tianyu
2014-08-05 8:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-05 9:28 ` Lan Tianyu
2014-08-12 7:31 ` [PATCH V2] " Lan Tianyu
2014-08-12 7:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-12 11:36 ` Prarit Bhargava [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53E9FC39.1030700@redhat.com \
--to=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tianyu.lan@intel.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox