From: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com>
To: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com" <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [REVERT][v3.16-rc7][STABLE] usb: xhci: Prefer endpoint context dequeue pointer over stopped_trb
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:11:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53EBB851.9070505@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53D9B664.4020401@canonical.com>
On 07/30/2014 11:22 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> On 07/30/2014 06:42 PM, Julius Werner wrote:
>> Hi Joseph,
>>
>>> Julius, I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch
>>> author. Do you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose
>>> this issue, or would it be best to continue with this revert request?
>> As I understand it, this crash will disappear with Mathias' new rework
>> for finding the cycle state bit in
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg111259.html , so a revert
>> should not be necessary.
> Hi Julius / Mathias,
>
> I was able to built a test kernel with the patch against 3.16-rc7.
> However, the patch would not compile against the 3.13.y stable tree(I'll
> debug why further). Is there plans for a version of the patch that will
> work with stable kernels?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe
>
>
>
Just curious if there is an update on a version of the patch that will
build against the stable kernels? If not, I can dig deeper to find the
build failure.
Thanks,
Joe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-13 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-30 19:30 [REVERT][v3.16-rc7][STABLE] usb: xhci: Prefer endpoint context dequeue pointer over stopped_trb Joseph Salisbury
2014-07-30 22:42 ` Julius Werner
2014-07-31 1:40 ` Joseph Salisbury
2014-07-31 3:22 ` Joseph Salisbury
2014-08-13 19:11 ` Joseph Salisbury [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53EBB851.9070505@canonical.com \
--to=joseph.salisbury@canonical.com \
--cc=dustin.kirkland@canonical.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jwerner@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox