From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752001AbaHMTLU (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:11:20 -0400
Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:43293 "EHLO
	youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751341AbaHMTLS (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:11:18 -0400
Message-ID: <53EBB851.9070505@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:11:13 -0400
From: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        "mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com" <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [REVERT][v3.16-rc7][STABLE] usb: xhci: Prefer endpoint context
 dequeue pointer over stopped_trb
References: <53D947F3.6010301@canonical.com> <CAODwPW-tf0D70v5La1z+-jo5rgKFW_Q2fMCZGWZkf0DnyTUuTA@mail.gmail.com> <53D9B664.4020401@canonical.com>
In-Reply-To: <53D9B664.4020401@canonical.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 07/30/2014 11:22 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> On 07/30/2014 06:42 PM, Julius Werner wrote:
>> Hi Joseph,
>>
>>> Julius, I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch
>>> author.  Do you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose
>>> this issue, or would it be best to continue with this revert request?
>> As I understand it, this crash will disappear with Mathias' new rework
>> for finding the cycle state bit in
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg111259.html , so a revert
>> should not be necessary.
> Hi Julius / Mathias,
>
> I was able to built a test kernel with the patch against 3.16-rc7. 
> However, the patch would not compile against the 3.13.y stable tree(I'll
> debug why further).  Is there plans for a version of the patch that will
> work with stable kernels?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe
>
>
>
Just curious if there is an update on a version of the patch that will
build against the stable kernels?  If not, I can dig deeper to find the
build failure.

Thanks,

Joe