linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: Usage of _PAGE_PCD et al in i915 driver
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 05:55:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53EC331F.3000508@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140813080705.31a0901a@jbarnes-desktop>

On 08/13/2014 05:07 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 15:14:15 +0200
> Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
>> Adding relevant mailing lists.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
>>> I'm just about to create a patch for full PAT support in the Linux
>>> kernel, including Xen. For this purpose I introduce a translation
>>> between cache modes and pte bits.
>>>
>>> Scanning the kernel sources for usage of the cache mode bits in the
>>> pte I discovered  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h is using
>>> _PAGE_PCD, _PAGE_PWT and _PAGE_PAT. I think those defines are used
>>> to create ptes not for usage by the main processor, but for the
>>> graphics processor. Is this true? In this case I'd suggest to define
>>> i915-specific macros instead of using the x86 ones.
>>
>> Yeah, those are gpu specific PAT tables, but the hw engineers
>> specifically designed this to match, and we've tried to follow the cpu
>> side to match it. Especially in the future that will be somewhat
>> important, since we want to fully share the entire address space
>> between cpu and gpu on the next platform. Jesse is working on that.
>
> Right, we have an x86 compatible MMU in the GPU itself, so re-using the
> defines makes sense.  I suppose with your work you'll move them and
> make them a bit more opaque?  If so, we'll still want a way to get at
> them directly, or access your mapping functions for generating PTE bits
> for the GPU MMU.

Using the mapping functions I'm introducing should work, if the MMU has
an x86 compatible MSR_IA32_CR_PAT which is configured the same way as
on the x86 processor (be aware that Xen is using another MSR_IA32_CR_PAT
setting as the Linux kernel).

Juergen


  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-14  3:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-08 11:23 Usage of _PAGE_PCD et al in i915 driver Juergen Gross
2014-08-08 13:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-13 15:07   ` Jesse Barnes
2014-08-14  3:55     ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2014-08-15 10:21       ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2014-08-18  5:31         ` Juergen Gross
2014-08-18 10:21           ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-08-18 10:36             ` Juergen Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53EC331F.3000508@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).