public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Sanjay Rao <srao@redhat.com>, Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] time,signal: protect resource use statistics with seqlock
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:36:16 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53ECF390.40403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140814161247.GA32715@redhat.com>

On 08/14/2014 12:12 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/14, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 08/14/2014 10:24 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>> On 08/13, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>>>
>>>> @@ -862,11 +862,9 @@ void do_sys_times(struct tms *tms) {
>>>> cputime_t tgutime, tgstime, cutime, cstime;
>>>>
>>>> -	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
>>>> thread_group_cputime_adjusted(current, &tgutime, &tgstime);
>>>> cutime = current->signal->cutime; cstime =
>>>> current->signal->cstime; -
>>>> spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
>>>
>>> Ah, wait, there is another problem afaics...
>>
>> Last night I worked on another problem with this code.
>>
>> After propagating the stats from a dying task to the signal struct,
>> we need to make sure that that task's stats are not counted twice.
> 
> Heh indeed ;) Can't understand how I missed that.
> 
>> This requires zeroing the stats under the write_seqlock, which was
>> easy enough to add.
> 
> Or you can expand the scope of write_seqlock/write_sequnlock, so that
> __unhash_process in called from inside the critical section. This looks
> simpler at first glance.

The problem with that is that wait_task_zombie() calls
thread_group_cputime_adjusted() in that if() branch, and
that code ends up taking the seqlock for read...

However, in __exit_signal that approach should work.

> Hmm, wait, it seems there is yet another problem ;) Afaics, you also
> need to modify __exit_signal() so that ->sum_sched_runtime/etc are
> accounted unconditionally, even if the group leader exits.
> 
> Probably this is not a big problem, and sys_times() or clock_gettime()
> do not care at all because they use current.
> 
> But without this change thread_group_cputime(reaped_zombie) won't look
> at this task_struct at all, this can lead to non-monotonic result if
> it was previously called when this task was alive (non-reaped).

You mean this whole block needs to run regardless of whether
the group is dead?

                task_cputime(tsk, &utime, &stime);
                write_seqlock(&sig->stats_lock);
                sig->utime += utime;
                sig->stime += stime;
                sig->gtime += task_gtime(tsk);
                sig->min_flt += tsk->min_flt;
                sig->maj_flt += tsk->maj_flt;
                sig->nvcsw += tsk->nvcsw;
                sig->nivcsw += tsk->nivcsw;
                sig->inblock += task_io_get_inblock(tsk);
                sig->oublock += task_io_get_oublock(tsk);
                task_io_accounting_add(&sig->ioac, &tsk->ioac);
                sig->sum_sched_runtime += tsk->se.sum_exec_runtime;

How does that square with wait_task_zombie reaping the
statistics of the whole group with thread_group_cputime_adjusted()
when the group leader is exiting?

Could that lead to things being double-counted?

Or do you mean ONLY ->sum_sched_runtime is unconditionally
accounted in __exit_signal(), because wait_task_zombie() seems
to be missing that one?

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-14 17:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-12 18:25 [PATCH RFC] time: drop do_sys_times spinlock Rik van Riel
2014-08-12 19:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-12 19:22   ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-12 22:27   ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 17:22     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-13 17:35       ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 18:08         ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-13 18:25           ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 18:45             ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-13 18:57               ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 21:03               ` [PATCH RFC] time,signal: protect resource use statistics with seqlock Rik van Riel
2014-08-14  0:43                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-14  1:57                   ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-14 13:34                     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-14 14:39                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15  2:52                         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-15 14:26                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15 22:33                             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-14 13:22                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 13:38                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-14 13:53                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 17:48                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 18:34                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15  5:19                     ` Mike Galbraith
2014-08-15  6:28                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-15  9:37                         ` Mike Galbraith
2014-08-15  9:44                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-15 16:36                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15 16:49                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15 17:25                             ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-15 18:36                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 14:24                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 15:37                   ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-14 16:12                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 17:36                       ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-08-14 18:15                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 19:03                           ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-14 19:37                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15  2:14                       ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-15 14:58                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-13 21:03               ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 17:40       ` [PATCH RFC] time: drop do_sys_times spinlock Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-13 17:50         ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 17:53           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-13  6:59   ` Mike Galbraith
2014-08-13 11:11     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-13 13:24       ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 13:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-13 14:09           ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53ECF390.40403@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fmayhar@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=srao@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox