From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Sanjay Rao <srao@redhat.com>, Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] time,signal: protect resource use statistics with seqlock
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:36:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53ECF390.40403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140814161247.GA32715@redhat.com>
On 08/14/2014 12:12 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/14, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 08/14/2014 10:24 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>> On 08/13, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>>>
>>>> @@ -862,11 +862,9 @@ void do_sys_times(struct tms *tms) {
>>>> cputime_t tgutime, tgstime, cutime, cstime;
>>>>
>>>> - spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
>>>> thread_group_cputime_adjusted(current, &tgutime, &tgstime);
>>>> cutime = current->signal->cutime; cstime =
>>>> current->signal->cstime; -
>>>> spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
>>>
>>> Ah, wait, there is another problem afaics...
>>
>> Last night I worked on another problem with this code.
>>
>> After propagating the stats from a dying task to the signal struct,
>> we need to make sure that that task's stats are not counted twice.
>
> Heh indeed ;) Can't understand how I missed that.
>
>> This requires zeroing the stats under the write_seqlock, which was
>> easy enough to add.
>
> Or you can expand the scope of write_seqlock/write_sequnlock, so that
> __unhash_process in called from inside the critical section. This looks
> simpler at first glance.
The problem with that is that wait_task_zombie() calls
thread_group_cputime_adjusted() in that if() branch, and
that code ends up taking the seqlock for read...
However, in __exit_signal that approach should work.
> Hmm, wait, it seems there is yet another problem ;) Afaics, you also
> need to modify __exit_signal() so that ->sum_sched_runtime/etc are
> accounted unconditionally, even if the group leader exits.
>
> Probably this is not a big problem, and sys_times() or clock_gettime()
> do not care at all because they use current.
>
> But without this change thread_group_cputime(reaped_zombie) won't look
> at this task_struct at all, this can lead to non-monotonic result if
> it was previously called when this task was alive (non-reaped).
You mean this whole block needs to run regardless of whether
the group is dead?
task_cputime(tsk, &utime, &stime);
write_seqlock(&sig->stats_lock);
sig->utime += utime;
sig->stime += stime;
sig->gtime += task_gtime(tsk);
sig->min_flt += tsk->min_flt;
sig->maj_flt += tsk->maj_flt;
sig->nvcsw += tsk->nvcsw;
sig->nivcsw += tsk->nivcsw;
sig->inblock += task_io_get_inblock(tsk);
sig->oublock += task_io_get_oublock(tsk);
task_io_accounting_add(&sig->ioac, &tsk->ioac);
sig->sum_sched_runtime += tsk->se.sum_exec_runtime;
How does that square with wait_task_zombie reaping the
statistics of the whole group with thread_group_cputime_adjusted()
when the group leader is exiting?
Could that lead to things being double-counted?
Or do you mean ONLY ->sum_sched_runtime is unconditionally
accounted in __exit_signal(), because wait_task_zombie() seems
to be missing that one?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-14 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-12 18:25 [PATCH RFC] time: drop do_sys_times spinlock Rik van Riel
2014-08-12 19:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-12 19:22 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-12 22:27 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 17:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-13 17:35 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 18:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-13 18:25 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 18:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-13 18:57 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 21:03 ` [PATCH RFC] time,signal: protect resource use statistics with seqlock Rik van Riel
2014-08-14 0:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-14 1:57 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-14 13:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-14 14:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15 2:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-15 14:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15 22:33 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-14 13:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 13:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-14 13:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 17:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 18:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15 5:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-08-15 6:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-15 9:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-08-15 9:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-15 16:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15 16:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15 17:25 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-15 18:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 14:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 15:37 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-14 16:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 17:36 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-08-14 18:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 19:03 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-14 19:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15 2:14 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-15 14:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-13 21:03 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 17:40 ` [PATCH RFC] time: drop do_sys_times spinlock Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-13 17:50 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 17:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-13 6:59 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-08-13 11:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-13 13:24 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 13:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-13 14:09 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53ECF390.40403@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fmayhar@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=srao@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox