From: "xiaofeng.yan" <xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: <mingo@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<juri.lelli@gmail.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<xiaofeng.yan2012@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/deadline: overrun could happen in start_hrtick_dl
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 16:38:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53EDC6F4.80001@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140812145254.GA7103@gmail.com>
On 2014/8/12 22:52, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * xiaofeng.yan <xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> It could be wrong for the precision of runtime and deadline
>> when the precision is within microsecond level. For example:
>> Task runtime deadline period
>> P1 200us 500us 500us
>>
>> This case need enbale HRTICK feature by the next command
>>
>> PC#echo "HRTICK" > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features
>> PC#trace-cmd record -e sched_switch &
>> PC#./schedtool -E -t 200000:500000 -e ./test
>>
>> Some of runtime and deadline run with millisecond level by
>> reading kernershark. Some pieces of trace.dat are as follows:
>> (remove some irrelevant information)
>> <idle>-0 157.603157: sched_switch: :R ==> 2481:4294967295: test
>> test-2481 157.603203: sched_switch: 2481:R ==> 0:120: swapper/2
>> <idle>-0 157.605657: sched_switch: :R ==> 2481:4294967295: test
>> test-2481 157.608183: sched_switch: 2481:R ==> 2483:120: trace-cmd
>> trace-cmd-2483 157.609656: sched_switch:2483:R==>2481:4294967295: test
>>
>> We can get the runtime from the information at some point.
>> runtime = 157.605657 - 157.608183
>> runtime = 0.002526(2.526ms)
>> The correct runtime should be less than or equal to 200us at some point.
>>
>> The problem is caused by a conditional judgment "delta > 10000".
>> Because no hrtimer start up to control the runtime when runtime is less than 10us.
>> So the process will continue to run until tick-period coming.
>>
>> Move the code with the limit of the least time slice
>> from hrtick_start_fair() to hrtick_start() because
>> EDF schedule class also need this function in start_hrtick_dl().
>>
>> To fix this problem, we call hrtimer_start() unconditionally in start_hrtick_dl(),
>> and make sure schedule slice won't be smaller than 10us in hrtimer_start().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan <xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
> The whole changelog is very hard to read and isn't proper English, nor
> is it truly explanatory. Could you please fix the changelog, or bounce
> it to someone who will fix it for you?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
Thanks for your reply. I will fix my change log with proper English.
Thanks
Yan
> .
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-15 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-06 9:08 [PATCH v3] sched/deadline: overrun could happen in start_hrtick_dl xiaofeng.yan
2014-08-06 10:39 ` Juri Lelli
2014-08-12 14:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-08-15 8:38 ` xiaofeng.yan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53EDC6F4.80001@huawei.com \
--to=xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=xiaofeng.yan2012@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox