From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751432AbaHOR6N (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2014 13:58:13 -0400 Received: from g5t1625.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.137.8]:31415 "EHLO g5t1625.atlanta.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751027AbaHOR6M (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2014 13:58:12 -0400 Message-ID: <53EE4A31.5080407@hp.com> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 13:58:09 -0400 From: Waiman Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130109 Thunderbird/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Chinner CC: Jason Low , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso , Scott J Norton Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] locking/rwsem: more aggressive use of optimistic spinning References: <1407119782-41119-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com> <1407119782-41119-3-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com> <1407125450.4710.38.camel@j-VirtualBox> <53DFAA53.4010003@hp.com> <20140813055153.GD20518@dastard> <53EB9522.2070804@hp.com> <20140815033447.GJ20518@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20140815033447.GJ20518@dastard> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/14/2014 11:34 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > xfs_io -f -c "truncate 500t" -c "extsize 1m" /path/to/vm/image/file > > -drive file=/path/to/vm/image/file,if=virtio,cache=none> > > In vm: > > download and build fsmark from here: > > git://oss.sgi.com/dgc/fs_mark > > download and install xfsprogs v3.2.1 from here: > > git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfsprogs.git tags/v3.2.1 > > Setup up the target filesystem: > > # mkfs.xfs -f -m "crc=1,finobt=1" /dev/vda > # mount -o logbsize=262144,nobarrier /dev/vda /mnt/scratch > > > Run: > > # fs_mark -D 10000 -S0 -n 50000 -s 0 -L 32 \ > -d /mnt/scratch/0 -d /mnt/scratch/1 \ > -d /mnt/scratch/2 -d /mnt/scratch/3 \ > -d /mnt/scratch/4 -d /mnt/scratch/5 \ > -d /mnt/scratch/6 -d /mnt/scratch/7 \ > -d /mnt/scratch/8 -d /mnt/scratch/9 \ > -d /mnt/scratch/10 -d /mnt/scratch/11 \ > -d /mnt/scratch/12 -d /mnt/scratch/13 \ > -d /mnt/scratch/14 -d /mnt/scratch/15 \ > > If you've got everything set up right, that should run at around > 200-250,000 file creates/s. When finished, unmount and run: > > # xfs_repair -o bhash=500000 /dev/vda > > And that should spend quite a long while pounding on the mmap_sem > until the the userspace buffer cache stops growing. > > I just ran the above on 3.16, saw this from perf: > > 37.30% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore > - _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore > - 62.00% rwsem_wake > - call_rwsem_wake > + 83.52% sys_mprotect > + 16.23% __do_page_fault > + 35.15% try_to_wake_up > + 0.96% update_blocked_averages > + 0.61% pagevec_lru_move_fn > - 23.35% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irq > - _raw_spin_unlock_irq > + 51.37% finish_task_switch > + 39.37% rwsem_down_write_failed > + 8.49% rwsem_down_read_failed > 0.62% run_timer_softirq > + 5.22% [kernel] [k] native_read_tsc > + 3.89% [kernel] [k] rwsem_down_write_failed > ..... > > Cheers, > > Dave. > Thank for the testing recipe. I am afraid that I can't find a 500TB SSD for testing purpose. Do you think the test will still be valid for exercising rwsem if I use a smaller SSD or maybe mechanical hard disk? -Longman