From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751598AbaHPQqt (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Aug 2014 12:46:49 -0400 Received: from mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com ([67.231.145.42]:50544 "EHLO mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751516AbaHPQqr (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Aug 2014 12:46:47 -0400 Message-ID: <53EF8AF2.2070605@fb.com> Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 12:46:42 -0400 From: Chris Mason User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: linux-btrfs , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Smaller btrfs pull References: <53EE42A9.7000607@fb.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [192.168.16.4] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52,1.0.27,0.0.0000 definitions=2014-08-16_02:2014-08-15,2014-08-16,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=fb_default_notspam policy=fb_default score=0 kscore.is_bulkscore=3.84692278032617e-14 kscore.compositescore=0 circleOfTrustscore=29.4129509548051 compositescore=0.998049563855454 urlsuspect_oldscore=0.998049563855454 suspectscore=0 recipient_domain_to_sender_totalscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 kscore.is_spamscore=0 recipient_to_sender_totalscore=0 recipient_domain_to_sender_domain_totalscore=64355 rbsscore=0.998049563855454 spamscore=0 recipient_to_sender_domain_totalscore=0 urlsuspectscore=0.9 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1408160221 X-FB-Internal: deliver Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/16/2014 11:11 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Chris Mason wrote: >> >> I've been running xfstests with these against your current git >> overnight, but I'm queueing up longer tests as well. I understand >> you may want to wait until rc2, but either way I'll get a sane queue >> into my linux-next branch for the rest of the rcs. > > You completely mis-understand. > > If something isn't appropriate for the merge window, then it sure as > HELL isn't appropriate for later rc's either. > > So I'm not going to pull some "stragglers" later and just pull some > initial stuff now. That's not how this works. Hi Linus, Sorry that I wasn't clear. I had already pushed 1/2 of the commits off to the 3.18 merge window. Of the remaining commits, my plan was to send the fixes that would qualify for rc2 or rc3 during those rcs. I was trying to say that I fully expected these patches to be closely inspected. I'll bring my white gloves. -chris