linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	"graeme.gregory@linaro.org" <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	"grant.likely@linaro.org" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>, Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
	Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Get the enable method for SMP initialization in ACPI way
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 19:34:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53F2471D.2010203@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407166105-17675-9-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>



On 04/08/14 16:28, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> ACPI 5.1 only has two explicit methods to boot up SMP,
> PSCI and Parking protocol, but the Parking protocol is
> only suitable for ARMv7 now, so make PSCI as the only way
> for the SMP boot protocol before some updates for the
> ACPI spec or the Parking protocol spec.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h |   21 ++++++++++++++
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h  |    3 +-
>   arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c      |    9 ++++++
>   arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c   |   62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c       |   27 +++++++++++++++++-
>   5 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> index e877967..022f4ad 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,27 @@
>
>   /* Basic configuration for ACPI */
>   #ifdef	CONFIG_ACPI
> +/*
> + * ACPI 5.1 only has two explicit methods to
> + * boot up SMP, PSCI and Parking protocol,
> + * but the Parking protocol is only defined
> + * for ARMv7 now, so make PSCI as the only
> + * way for the SMP boot protocol before some
> + * updates for the ACPI spec or the Parking
> + * protocol spec.
> + *
> + * This enum is intend to make the boot method
> + * scalable when above updates are happended,
> + * which NOT means to support all of them.
> + */
> +enum acpi_smp_boot_protocol {
> +	ACPI_SMP_BOOT_PSCI,
> +	ACPI_SMP_BOOT_PARKING_PROTOCOL,
> +	ACPI_SMP_BOOT_PROTOCOL_MAX
> +};
> +
> +enum acpi_smp_boot_protocol smp_boot_protocol(void);
> +
>   #define acpi_strict 1	/* No out-of-spec workarounds on ARM64 */
>   extern int acpi_disabled;
>   extern int acpi_noirq;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
> index a498f2c..282932c2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -39,7 +39,8 @@ extern void show_ipi_list(struct seq_file *p, int prec);
>   extern void handle_IPI(int ipinr, struct pt_regs *regs);
>
>   /*
> - * Setup the set of possible CPUs (via set_cpu_possible)
> + * Discover the set of possible CPUs and determine their
> + * SMP operations.
>    */
>   extern void smp_init_cpus(void);
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> index 9e07d99..8a54b4e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> @@ -170,6 +170,15 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_madt_gic_cpu_interface_entries(void)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>
> +/* Protocol to bring up secondary CPUs */
> +enum acpi_smp_boot_protocol smp_boot_protocol(void)
> +{
> +	if (acpi_psci_present())
> +		return ACPI_SMP_BOOT_PSCI;
> +	else
> +		return ACPI_SMP_BOOT_PARKING_PROTOCOL;
> +}
> +

Which do you need this here ? Can't you use acpi_psci_present directly
in acpi_get_cpu_boot_method ?

>   static int __init acpi_parse_fadt(struct acpi_table_header *table)
>   {
>   	struct acpi_table_fadt *fadt = (struct acpi_table_fadt *)table;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c
> index d62d12f..05bc314 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c
> @@ -16,11 +16,13 @@
>    * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>    */
>
> -#include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
> -#include <asm/smp_plat.h>
>   #include <linux/errno.h>
>   #include <linux/of.h>
>   #include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
> +#include <asm/smp_plat.h>
>
>   extern const struct cpu_operations smp_spin_table_ops;
>   extern const struct cpu_operations cpu_psci_ops;
> @@ -49,12 +51,44 @@ static const struct cpu_operations * __init cpu_get_ops(const char *name)
>   	return NULL;
>   }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +/*
> + * Get a cpu's boot method in the ACPI way.
> + */
> +static char * __init acpi_get_cpu_boot_method(void)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * For ACPI 5.1, only two kind of methods are provided,
> +	 * Parking protocol and PSCI, but Parking protocol is
> +	 * specified for ARMv7 only, so make PSCI as the only method
> +	 * for SMP initialization before the ACPI spec or Parking
> +	 * protocol spec is updated.
> +	 */
> +	switch (smp_boot_protocol()) {
> +	case ACPI_SMP_BOOT_PSCI:
> +		return "psci";
> +	case ACPI_SMP_BOOT_PARKING_PROTOCOL:
> +	default:
> +		return NULL;
> +	}

Use acpi_psci_present as mentioned above.

> +}
> +#else
> +static inline char * __init acpi_get_cpu_boot_method(void) { return NULL; }
> +#endif
> +
>   /*
> - * Read a cpu's enable method from the device tree and record it in cpu_ops.
> + * Read a cpu's enable method and record it in cpu_ops.
>    */
>   int __init cpu_read_ops(struct device_node *dn, int cpu)
>   {
> -	const char *enable_method = of_get_property(dn, "enable-method", NULL);
> +	const char *enable_method;
> +
> +	if (!acpi_disabled) {
> +		enable_method = acpi_get_cpu_boot_method();
> +		goto get_ops;
> +	}
> +
> +	enable_method = of_get_property(dn, "enable-method", NULL);
>   	if (!enable_method) {
>   		/*
>   		 * The boot CPU may not have an enable method (e.g. when
> @@ -66,10 +100,17 @@ int __init cpu_read_ops(struct device_node *dn, int cpu)
>   		return -ENOENT;
>   	}
>
> +get_ops:
>   	cpu_ops[cpu] = cpu_get_ops(enable_method);
>   	if (!cpu_ops[cpu]) {
> -		pr_warn("%s: unsupported enable-method property: %s\n",
> -			dn->full_name, enable_method);
> +		if (acpi_disabled) {
> +			pr_warn("%s: unsupported enable-method property: %s\n",
> +				dn->full_name, enable_method);
> +		} else {
> +			pr_warn("CPU %d: boot protocol unsupported or unknown\n",
> +				cpu);
> +		}
> +
>   		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>   	}
>
> @@ -78,7 +119,14 @@ int __init cpu_read_ops(struct device_node *dn, int cpu)
>
>   void __init cpu_read_bootcpu_ops(void)
>   {
> -	struct device_node *dn = of_get_cpu_node(0, NULL);
> +	struct device_node *dn;
> +
> +	if (!acpi_disabled) {
> +		cpu_read_ops(NULL, 0);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +

Again not good to mix ACPI in DT functions forcing you to pass
device_node ptr as NULL, better to separate this. Once you gather all
this !acpi_disabled case, you can create appropriate abstractions to be
used in setup.c

E.g. here you check !acpi_disabled and pass NULL for DT node to
cpu_read_ops and hence again you check for !acpi_disabled in
cpu_read_ops. So you need first identify all these checks and put in one
place to understand well how you can refactor existing code to avoid
these multiple checks.


> +	dn = of_get_cpu_node(0, NULL);
>   	if (!dn) {
>   		pr_err("Failed to find device node for boot cpu\n");
>   		return;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index 8f1d37c..e21bbc9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static void (*smp_cross_call)(const struct cpumask *, unsigned int);
>    * cpu logical map array containing MPIDR values related to logical
>    * cpus. Assumes that cpu_logical_map(0) has already been initialized.
>    */
> -void __init smp_init_cpus(void)
> +static void __init of_smp_init_cpus(void)
>   {
>   	struct device_node *dn = NULL;
>   	unsigned int i, cpu = 1;
> @@ -418,6 +418,31 @@ next:
>   			set_cpu_possible(i, true);
>   }
>
> +/*
> + * In ACPI mode, the cpu possible map was enumerated before SMP
> + * initialization when MADT table was parsed, so we can get the
> + * possible map here to initialize CPUs.
> + */
> +static void __init acpi_smp_init_cpus(void)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		if (cpu_read_ops(NULL, cpu) != 0)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		cpu_ops[cpu]->cpu_init(NULL, cpu);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void __init smp_init_cpus(void)
> +{
> +	if (acpi_disabled)
> +		of_smp_init_cpus();
> +	else
> +		acpi_smp_init_cpus();
> +}
> +
>   void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>   {
>   	int err;
>


  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-18 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-04 15:28 [PATCH v2 00/18] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 01/18] ARM64: Move the init of cpu_logical_map(0) before unflatten_device_tree() Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 02/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Get RSDP and ACPI boot-time tables Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 18:30   ` Sudeep Holla
2014-08-19  9:35     ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-19  9:47       ` Sudeep Holla
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 03/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce lowlevel suspend function Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 04/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Make PCI optional for ACPI on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 05/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse FADT table to get PSCI flags for PSCI init Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 18:32   ` Sudeep Holla
2014-08-19 10:39     ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-19 11:07       ` Sudeep Holla
     [not found]   ` <20140818142721.GR20043@localhost>
2014-08-19  3:50     ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-19 11:10       ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-19 12:13         ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-19 22:55           ` Moore, Robert
2014-08-20  4:12             ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 06/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse MADT to map logical cpu to MPIDR and get cpu_possible/present_map Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 18:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2014-08-19 11:00     ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-19 16:46       ` [Linaro-acpi] " Zi Shen Lim
2014-08-20  3:24         ` Hanjun Guo
     [not found]   ` <20140818142728.GS20043@localhost>
2014-08-19  7:36     ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-20 14:38       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-21  2:51         ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 07/18] ACPI / table: Print GIC information when MADT is parsed Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 08/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Get the enable method for SMP initialization in ACPI way Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 18:34   ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2014-08-19 11:26     ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 18:56   ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-19 12:11     ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-19 19:25       ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-20  3:25         ` Hanjun Guo
     [not found]   ` <20140818142733.GT20043@localhost>
2014-08-19  8:32     ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-20 14:52       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-21  3:06         ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 09/18] ACPI / processor: Make it possible to get CPU hardware ID via GICC Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 18:34   ` Sudeep Holla
2014-08-19 11:29     ` Hanjun Guo
     [not found]   ` <20140818142740.GU20043@localhost>
2014-08-19  8:37     ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-20 14:56       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-21  3:25         ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 10/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC and register device's gsi Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 18:34   ` Sudeep Holla
2014-08-19 11:36     ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 11/18] ACPI / table: Add new function to get table entries Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 12/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Add GICv2 specific ACPI boot support Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 13/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse GTDT to initialize arch timer Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 14/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Select ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY if ACPI is enabled on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 15/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce early_param for "acpi" and set ACPI default off Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 16/18] ARM64 / ACPI: If we chose to boot from acpi then disable FDT Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 17/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Enable ARM64 in Kconfig Hanjun Guo
     [not found]   ` <20140818142745.GV20043@localhost>
2014-08-19  8:38     ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 18/18] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 20:48   ` Randy Dunlap
2014-08-05  3:36     ` Hanjun Guo
     [not found] ` <CAJRNFK+UfJhGR65tOecy=X+YdHQHiNPZ4p_p8LUxhRL3GW5gFw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-08-05  3:34   ` [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v2 00/18] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 17:08     ` Alexander Spyridakis
2014-08-18 18:11       ` Graeme Gregory

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53F2471D.2010203@arm.com \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=Marc.Zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=rric@kernel.org \
    --cc=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).