From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751857AbaHWRUX (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Aug 2014 13:20:23 -0400 Received: from mail.active-venture.com ([67.228.131.205]:64281 "EHLO mail.active-venture.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751337AbaHWRUV (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Aug 2014 13:20:21 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 108.223.40.66 Message-ID: <53F8CD4F.7030609@roeck-us.net> Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 10:20:15 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sebastian Reichel CC: Russell King , Wim Van Sebroeck , Catalin Marinas , Maxime Ripard , Andrew Morton , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , Arnd Bergmann , Heiko Stuebner , Jonas Jensen , Randy Dunlap , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , David Woodhouse , Tomasz Figa , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/11] power/restart: Call machine_restart instead of arm_pm_restart References: <1408495538-27480-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <1408495538-27480-3-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <20140821203904.GA26620@earth.universe> In-Reply-To: <20140821203904.GA26620@earth.universe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/21/2014 01:39 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 05:45:29PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> machine_restart is supported on non-ARM platforms, and and ultimately calls >> arm_pm_restart, so dont call arm_pm_restart directly but use the more >> generic function. >> >> Cc: Russell King >> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck >> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas >> Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner > > Acked-by: Sebastian Reichel > > Do you want me to take the patch via battery-2.6.git? > Hi Sebastian, thanks a lot for the Ack. I am not sure if it is better to submit all patches together or through individual maintainer trees. Let's wait for Andrew's suggestion how we should proceed. Thanks, Guenter