public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thorsten Knabe <linux@thorsten-knabe.de>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML: UBD: Fix for processes stuck in D state forever in UserModeLinux
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 19:43:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53F8D2A7.70204@thorsten-knabe.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53F8B48D.8060209@nod.at>

Hi Richard.

On 08/23/2014 05:34 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Am 23.08.2014 15:47, schrieb Thorsten Knabe:
>> From: Thorsten Knabe <linux@thorsten-knabe.de>
>>
>> UML: UBD: Fix for processes stuck in D state forever in UserModeLinux.
>>
>> Starting with Linux 3.12 processes get stuck in D state forever in
>> UserModeLinux under sync heavy workloads. This bug was introduced by
>> commit 805f11a0d5 (um: ubd: Add REQ_FLUSH suppport).
>> Fix bug by adding a check if FLUSH request was successfully submitted to
>> the I/O thread and keeping the FLUSH request on the request queue on
>> submission failures.
>>
>> Fixes: 805f11a0d5 (um: ubd: Add REQ_FLUSH suppport)
>> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Knabe <linux@thorsten-knabe.de>
> 
> Thanks a lot for hunting this issue down.
> 
>> ---
>> Patch applies to 3.16.1.
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
>> index 3716e69..b7d2840 100644
>> --- a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
>> +++ b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
>> @@ -1277,7 +1277,7 @@ static void do_ubd_request(struct request_queue *q)
>>
>>  	while(1){
>>  		struct ubd *dev = q->queuedata;
>> -		if(dev->end_sg == 0){
>> +		if(dev->request == NULL){
> 
> Why do we need this specific change?

This change is required, because for FLUSH requests dev->end_sg is
initialized to 0 by blk_rq_map_sg() a few lines above, as FLUSH requests
have no data blocks attached to themselves.

Checking for dev->end_sg == 0 would then replace a not yet submitted
FLUSH request by the next request on the next iteration of the while
loop, also the FLUSH request was scheduled for resubmission to the I/O
thread.

Kind regards
Thorsten

> 
> Thanks,
> //richard
> 


-- 
___
 |        | /                 E-Mail: linux@thorsten-knabe.de
 |horsten |/\nabe                WWW: http://linux.thorsten-knabe.de

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-23 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-23 13:47 [PATCH] UML: UBD: Fix for processes stuck in D state forever in UserModeLinux Thorsten Knabe
2014-08-23 15:34 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-08-23 17:43   ` Thorsten Knabe [this message]
2014-08-24 12:11     ` Richard Weinberger
2014-08-24 23:02       ` Thorsten Knabe
2014-08-25 13:25         ` Richard Weinberger
2014-08-25 14:00           ` Thorsten Knabe
2014-08-25 14:04             ` Richard Weinberger
2014-09-16 16:50               ` Richard Weinberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53F8D2A7.70204@thorsten-knabe.de \
    --to=linux@thorsten-knabe.de \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=thomas@m3y3r.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox