public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thorsten Knabe <linux@thorsten-knabe.de>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML: UBD: Fix for processes stuck in D state forever in UserModeLinux
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 01:02:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FA6EF3.3080902@thorsten-knabe.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53F9D661.8080100@nod.at>

On 08/24/2014 02:11 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 23.08.2014 19:43, schrieb Thorsten Knabe:
>> Hi Richard.
>>
>> On 08/23/2014 05:34 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Am 23.08.2014 15:47, schrieb Thorsten Knabe:
>>>> From: Thorsten Knabe <linux@thorsten-knabe.de>
>>>>
>>>> UML: UBD: Fix for processes stuck in D state forever in UserModeLinux.
>>>>
>>>> Starting with Linux 3.12 processes get stuck in D state forever in
>>>> UserModeLinux under sync heavy workloads. This bug was introduced by
>>>> commit 805f11a0d5 (um: ubd: Add REQ_FLUSH suppport).
>>>> Fix bug by adding a check if FLUSH request was successfully submitted to
>>>> the I/O thread and keeping the FLUSH request on the request queue on
>>>> submission failures.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 805f11a0d5 (um: ubd: Add REQ_FLUSH suppport)
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Knabe <linux@thorsten-knabe.de>
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for hunting this issue down.
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> Patch applies to 3.16.1.
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
>>>> index 3716e69..b7d2840 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
>>>> @@ -1277,7 +1277,7 @@ static void do_ubd_request(struct request_queue *q)
>>>>
>>>>  	while(1){
>>>>  		struct ubd *dev = q->queuedata;
>>>> -		if(dev->end_sg == 0){
>>>> +		if(dev->request == NULL){
>>>
>>> Why do we need this specific change?
>>
>> This change is required, because for FLUSH requests dev->end_sg is
>> initialized to 0 by blk_rq_map_sg() a few lines above, as FLUSH requests
>> have no data blocks attached to themselves.
> 
> You meant "below"? Looks like I really miss something here.
> At the bottom of the while(1) loop we have
>                 dev->end_sg = 0;
>                 dev->request = NULL;

No. The problematic line is:
                        dev->end_sg = blk_rq_map_sg(q, req, dev->sg);
and blk_rq_map_sg() returning 0 for REQ_FLUSH requests, because they
have no associated data blocks.

Hence on the next iteration of the while(1) loop:
                if(dev->end_sg == 0){
will be true, even if the request has not been successfully submitted to
the I/O thread in the previous iteration of the while(1) loop and a new
request will be fetched:
                        struct request *req = blk_fetch_request(q);
                        if(req == NULL)
                                return;

                        dev->request = req;
                        dev->rq_pos = blk_rq_pos(req);
                        dev->start_sg = 0;
                        dev->end_sg = blk_rq_map_sg(q, req, dev->sg);
                }

Thus the REQ_FLUSH request got lost and will never get submitted to the
I/O thread, there will be no matching answer from the I/O thread and the
lost REQ_FLUSH request will never complete...

Regards
Thorsten

> 
> Thanks,
> //richard
> 


-- 
___
 |        | /                 E-Mail: linux@thorsten-knabe.de
 |horsten |/\nabe                WWW: http://linux.thorsten-knabe.de

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-24 23:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-23 13:47 [PATCH] UML: UBD: Fix for processes stuck in D state forever in UserModeLinux Thorsten Knabe
2014-08-23 15:34 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-08-23 17:43   ` Thorsten Knabe
2014-08-24 12:11     ` Richard Weinberger
2014-08-24 23:02       ` Thorsten Knabe [this message]
2014-08-25 13:25         ` Richard Weinberger
2014-08-25 14:00           ` Thorsten Knabe
2014-08-25 14:04             ` Richard Weinberger
2014-09-16 16:50               ` Richard Weinberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53FA6EF3.3080902@thorsten-knabe.de \
    --to=linux@thorsten-knabe.de \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=thomas@m3y3r.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox