From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933947AbaHZIBF (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2014 04:01:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35115 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757143AbaHZIBC (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2014 04:01:02 -0400 Message-ID: <53FC3E9A.1020108@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 10:00:26 +0200 From: Daniel Borkmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Alexei Starovoitov , Stephen Hemminger , "David S. Miller" , Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , Steven Rostedt , Chema Gonzalez , Eric Dumazet , Peter Zijlstra , Brendan Gregg , Namhyung Kim , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Kees Cook , Linux API , Network Development , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 4/6] bpf: enable bpf syscall on x64 and i386 References: <1409014858-1410-1-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> <1409014858-1410-5-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> <20140825205201.10ac5ee3@uryu.home.lan> <20140826074655.GB19799@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140826074655.GB19799@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/26/2014 09:46 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Alexei Starovoitov wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Stephen Hemminger >> wrote: >>> Per discussion at Kernel Summit. Every new syscall requires >>> a manual page and test programs. We have had too many new syscalls >>> that are DOA. >> >> There is verifier testsuite that is testing eBPF verifier from userspace >> via bpf syscall. Also there are multiple examples and libbpf. >> I think test coverage for bpf syscall is quite substantial already. > > This is in tools/bpf/, right? No, it contains a BPF JIT disasm, bpf assembler and a debugger, but the last two are for the 'classic' BPF interface only. There's a test suite for BPF/eBPF in general under lib/test_bpf.c, but so far it tests only the current code w/o eBPF verifier. That said, I think Alexei is referring to the examples et al from the bigger previous proposed patch set.