From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] regmap: cache: Fix regcache_sync_block for non-autoincrementing devices
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:52:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FD7210.606@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hk35vpc18.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
On 08/26/2014 05:21 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:03:12 +0300,
> Jarkko Nikula wrote:
>> Commit 75a5f89f635c ("regmap: cache: Write consecutive registers in a single
>> block write") expected that autoincrementing writes are supported if
>> hardware has a register format which can support raw writes.
>>
>> This is not necessarily true and thus for instance rbtree sync can fail when
>> there is need to sync multiple consecutive registers but block write to
>> device fails due not supported autoincrementing writes.
>>
>> Fix this by spliting raw block sync to series of single register writes for
>> devices that don't support autoincrementing writes.
> Wouldn't it suffice to correct regmap_can_raw_write() to return false
> if map->use_single_rw is set?
>
I don't know. I was thinking that also but was unsure about it since
regcache_sync_block_raw() and regcache_sync_block_single() code paths
use different regmap write functions. regcache_sync_block_raw() ends up
calling _regmap_raw_write() which takes care of page select operation
when needed and regcache_sync_block_single() uses _regmap_write() which
doesn't.
Which makes me thinking should the regcache_sync_block_single() also use
_regmap_raw_write() in order to take care of page selects?
--
Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-27 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-26 14:03 [PATCH 0/2] ASoC/regmap: rt5640: Fix resume Jarkko Nikula
2014-08-26 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] regmap: cache: Fix regcache_sync_block for non-autoincrementing devices Jarkko Nikula
2014-08-26 14:21 ` [alsa-devel] " Takashi Iwai
2014-08-27 5:52 ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
2014-08-27 8:18 ` Mark Brown
2014-08-27 11:58 ` Mark Brown
2014-08-26 14:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: rt5640: Do not allow regmap to use bulk read-write operations Jarkko Nikula
2014-08-27 12:00 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53FD7210.606@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox