linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>, Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/S5P EXYNOS AR..." 
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] drm/exynos/ipp: free partially allocated resources on error
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 08:59:00 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FE70C4.9020501@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53FDB297.7070400@samsung.com>

Hi,

On 08/27/2014 07:27 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 08/26/2014 07:00 AM, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>> Hi Andrzej,
>>
>> On 08/22/2014 04:52 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>> In case of allocation errors some already allocated buffers
>>> were not freed. The patch fixes it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c
>>> index 060a198..728f3b9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c
>>> @@ -599,6 +599,37 @@ static int ipp_set_mem_node(struct exynos_drm_ippdrv *ippdrv,
>>>  	return ret;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +static int ipp_put_mem_node(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
>>> +		struct drm_exynos_ipp_cmd_node *c_node,
>>> +		struct drm_exynos_ipp_mem_node *m_node)
>>> +{
>>> +	int i;
>>> +
>>> +	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("node[0x%x]\n", (int)m_node);
>>> +
>>> +	if (!m_node) {
>>> +		DRM_ERROR("invalid dequeue node.\n");
>>> +		return -EFAULT;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("ops_id[%d]\n", m_node->ops_id);
>>> +
>>> +	/* put gem buffer */
>>> +	for_each_ipp_planar(i) {
>>> +		unsigned long handle = m_node->buf_info.handles[i];
>>> +		if (handle)
>>> +			exynos_drm_gem_put_dma_addr(drm_dev, handle,
>>> +							c_node->filp);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	/* conditionally remove from queue */
>>> +	if (m_node->list.next)
>> How about do INIT_LIST_HEAD for list in ipp_get_mem_node()?
> 
> I am not sure if it is better. For sure it adds unnecessary
> initialization sequence.

In other words, this NULL checking is unnecessary if you initialize the
list_head by INIT_LIST_HEAD.

> Maybe adding list_is_initialized inline function to list.h would be the
> best solution.

There is just list_empty and we can't know whether list is initialized
or not. I recommend to use initialized list_head.

Thanks.

> 
> Regards
> Andrzej
> 
>>
>>> +		list_del(&m_node->list);
>>> +	kfree(m_node);
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static struct drm_exynos_ipp_mem_node
>>>  		*ipp_get_mem_node(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
>>>  		struct drm_file *file,
>>> @@ -634,7 +665,8 @@ static struct drm_exynos_ipp_mem_node
>>>  					qbuf->handle[i], file);
>>>  			if (IS_ERR(addr)) {
>>>  				DRM_ERROR("failed to get addr.\n");
>>> -				goto err_clear;
>>> +				ipp_put_mem_node(drm_dev, c_node, m_node);
>>> +				return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
>>>  			}
>>>  
>>>  			buf_info->handles[i] = qbuf->handle[i];
>>> @@ -649,40 +681,6 @@ static struct drm_exynos_ipp_mem_node
>>>  	mutex_unlock(&c_node->mem_lock);
>>>  
>>>  	return m_node;
>>> -
>>> -err_clear:
>>> -	kfree(m_node);
>>> -	return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static int ipp_put_mem_node(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
>>> -		struct drm_exynos_ipp_cmd_node *c_node,
>>> -		struct drm_exynos_ipp_mem_node *m_node)
>>> -{
>>> -	int i;
>>> -
>>> -	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("node[0x%x]\n", (int)m_node);
>>> -
>>> -	if (!m_node) {
>>> -		DRM_ERROR("invalid dequeue node.\n");
>>> -		return -EFAULT;
>>> -	}
>>> -
>>> -	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("ops_id[%d]\n", m_node->ops_id);
>>> -
>>> -	/* put gem buffer */
>>> -	for_each_ipp_planar(i) {
>>> -		unsigned long handle = m_node->buf_info.handles[i];
>>> -		if (handle)
>>> -			exynos_drm_gem_put_dma_addr(drm_dev, handle,
>>> -							c_node->filp);
>>> -	}
>>> -
>>> -	/* delete list in queue */
>>> -	list_del(&m_node->list);
>>> -	kfree(m_node);
>>> -
>>> -	return 0;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  static void ipp_free_event(struct drm_pending_event *event)
>>>
>>
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-27 23:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-22  7:52 [PATCH 00/15] drm/exynos/ipp: image post processing fixes and improvements, part four Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22  7:52 ` [PATCH 01/15] drm/exynos/ipp: remove fake pm callbacks Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22  7:52 ` [PATCH 02/15] drm/exynos/ipp: cancel works before command node clean Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22  7:52 ` [PATCH 03/15] drm/exynos/ipp: move file reference from memory to command node Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-26  2:55   ` Joonyoung Shim
2014-08-26  2:59     ` Joonyoung Shim
2014-08-26  6:16       ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22  7:52 ` [PATCH 04/15] drm/exynos/ipp: remove only related commands on file close Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22  7:52 ` [PATCH 05/15] drm/exynos/ipp: remove unused field in command node Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22  7:52 ` [PATCH 06/15] drm/exynos/ipp: free partially allocated resources on error Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-26  5:00   ` Joonyoung Shim
2014-08-27 10:27     ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-27 23:59       ` Joonyoung Shim [this message]
2014-08-22  7:52 ` [PATCH 07/15] drm/exynos/ipp: move nodes cleaning to separate function Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22  7:52 ` [PATCH 08/15] drm/exynos/ipp: clean memory nodes on command node cleaning Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22  7:52 ` [PATCH 09/15] drm/exynos/ipp: replace work_struct casting with better constructs Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22  7:52 ` [PATCH 10/15] drm/exynos/ipp: stop hardware before freeing memory Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22  7:52 ` [PATCH 11/15] drm/exynos/ipp: remove events during command cleaning Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22  7:52 ` [PATCH 12/15] drm/exynos/fimc: avoid clearing overflow bits Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22  7:52 ` [PATCH 13/15] drm/exynos/fimc: do not enable fimc twice Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22  7:52 ` [PATCH 14/15] drm/exynos/fimc: simplify buffer queuing Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-26  5:53   ` Joonyoung Shim
2014-08-26  6:20     ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-27 11:07   ` [PATCH v2 " Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22  7:52 ` [PATCH 15/15] drm/exynos/fimc: fix source buffer registers Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-26  5:57   ` Joonyoung Shim
2014-08-26  6:35     ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-26  6:47       ` Joonyoung Shim
2014-08-26  6:52 ` [PATCH 00/15] drm/exynos/ipp: image post processing fixes and improvements, part four Joonyoung Shim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53FE70C4.9020501@samsung.com \
    --to=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
    --cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=inki.dae@samsung.com \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).