From: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>, Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/S5P EXYNOS AR..."
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] drm/exynos/ipp: free partially allocated resources on error
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 08:59:00 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FE70C4.9020501@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53FDB297.7070400@samsung.com>
Hi,
On 08/27/2014 07:27 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 08/26/2014 07:00 AM, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>> Hi Andrzej,
>>
>> On 08/22/2014 04:52 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>> In case of allocation errors some already allocated buffers
>>> were not freed. The patch fixes it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c
>>> index 060a198..728f3b9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c
>>> @@ -599,6 +599,37 @@ static int ipp_set_mem_node(struct exynos_drm_ippdrv *ippdrv,
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int ipp_put_mem_node(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
>>> + struct drm_exynos_ipp_cmd_node *c_node,
>>> + struct drm_exynos_ipp_mem_node *m_node)
>>> +{
>>> + int i;
>>> +
>>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("node[0x%x]\n", (int)m_node);
>>> +
>>> + if (!m_node) {
>>> + DRM_ERROR("invalid dequeue node.\n");
>>> + return -EFAULT;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("ops_id[%d]\n", m_node->ops_id);
>>> +
>>> + /* put gem buffer */
>>> + for_each_ipp_planar(i) {
>>> + unsigned long handle = m_node->buf_info.handles[i];
>>> + if (handle)
>>> + exynos_drm_gem_put_dma_addr(drm_dev, handle,
>>> + c_node->filp);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* conditionally remove from queue */
>>> + if (m_node->list.next)
>> How about do INIT_LIST_HEAD for list in ipp_get_mem_node()?
>
> I am not sure if it is better. For sure it adds unnecessary
> initialization sequence.
In other words, this NULL checking is unnecessary if you initialize the
list_head by INIT_LIST_HEAD.
> Maybe adding list_is_initialized inline function to list.h would be the
> best solution.
There is just list_empty and we can't know whether list is initialized
or not. I recommend to use initialized list_head.
Thanks.
>
> Regards
> Andrzej
>
>>
>>> + list_del(&m_node->list);
>>> + kfree(m_node);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static struct drm_exynos_ipp_mem_node
>>> *ipp_get_mem_node(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
>>> struct drm_file *file,
>>> @@ -634,7 +665,8 @@ static struct drm_exynos_ipp_mem_node
>>> qbuf->handle[i], file);
>>> if (IS_ERR(addr)) {
>>> DRM_ERROR("failed to get addr.\n");
>>> - goto err_clear;
>>> + ipp_put_mem_node(drm_dev, c_node, m_node);
>>> + return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
>>> }
>>>
>>> buf_info->handles[i] = qbuf->handle[i];
>>> @@ -649,40 +681,6 @@ static struct drm_exynos_ipp_mem_node
>>> mutex_unlock(&c_node->mem_lock);
>>>
>>> return m_node;
>>> -
>>> -err_clear:
>>> - kfree(m_node);
>>> - return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static int ipp_put_mem_node(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
>>> - struct drm_exynos_ipp_cmd_node *c_node,
>>> - struct drm_exynos_ipp_mem_node *m_node)
>>> -{
>>> - int i;
>>> -
>>> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("node[0x%x]\n", (int)m_node);
>>> -
>>> - if (!m_node) {
>>> - DRM_ERROR("invalid dequeue node.\n");
>>> - return -EFAULT;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("ops_id[%d]\n", m_node->ops_id);
>>> -
>>> - /* put gem buffer */
>>> - for_each_ipp_planar(i) {
>>> - unsigned long handle = m_node->buf_info.handles[i];
>>> - if (handle)
>>> - exynos_drm_gem_put_dma_addr(drm_dev, handle,
>>> - c_node->filp);
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - /* delete list in queue */
>>> - list_del(&m_node->list);
>>> - kfree(m_node);
>>> -
>>> - return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void ipp_free_event(struct drm_pending_event *event)
>>>
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-27 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-22 7:52 [PATCH 00/15] drm/exynos/ipp: image post processing fixes and improvements, part four Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22 7:52 ` [PATCH 01/15] drm/exynos/ipp: remove fake pm callbacks Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22 7:52 ` [PATCH 02/15] drm/exynos/ipp: cancel works before command node clean Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22 7:52 ` [PATCH 03/15] drm/exynos/ipp: move file reference from memory to command node Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-26 2:55 ` Joonyoung Shim
2014-08-26 2:59 ` Joonyoung Shim
2014-08-26 6:16 ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22 7:52 ` [PATCH 04/15] drm/exynos/ipp: remove only related commands on file close Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22 7:52 ` [PATCH 05/15] drm/exynos/ipp: remove unused field in command node Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22 7:52 ` [PATCH 06/15] drm/exynos/ipp: free partially allocated resources on error Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-26 5:00 ` Joonyoung Shim
2014-08-27 10:27 ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-27 23:59 ` Joonyoung Shim [this message]
2014-08-22 7:52 ` [PATCH 07/15] drm/exynos/ipp: move nodes cleaning to separate function Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22 7:52 ` [PATCH 08/15] drm/exynos/ipp: clean memory nodes on command node cleaning Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22 7:52 ` [PATCH 09/15] drm/exynos/ipp: replace work_struct casting with better constructs Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22 7:52 ` [PATCH 10/15] drm/exynos/ipp: stop hardware before freeing memory Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22 7:52 ` [PATCH 11/15] drm/exynos/ipp: remove events during command cleaning Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22 7:52 ` [PATCH 12/15] drm/exynos/fimc: avoid clearing overflow bits Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22 7:52 ` [PATCH 13/15] drm/exynos/fimc: do not enable fimc twice Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22 7:52 ` [PATCH 14/15] drm/exynos/fimc: simplify buffer queuing Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-26 5:53 ` Joonyoung Shim
2014-08-26 6:20 ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-27 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 " Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-22 7:52 ` [PATCH 15/15] drm/exynos/fimc: fix source buffer registers Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-26 5:57 ` Joonyoung Shim
2014-08-26 6:35 ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-08-26 6:47 ` Joonyoung Shim
2014-08-26 6:52 ` [PATCH 00/15] drm/exynos/ipp: image post processing fixes and improvements, part four Joonyoung Shim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53FE70C4.9020501@samsung.com \
--to=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=inki.dae@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).