From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Beniamino Galvani <b.galvani@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Carlo Caione <carlo@caione.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] watchdog: add driver for Ricoh RN5T618 watchdog
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 05:11:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FF1C58.3070006@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140828071946.GF24579@lee--X1>
On 08/28/2014 12:19 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:13:56AM +0200, Beniamino Galvani wrote:
>>> This adds a driver for the watchdog timer available in Ricoh RN5T618
>>> PMIC. The device supports a programmable expiration time of 1, 8, 32
>>> or 128 seconds.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Beniamino Galvani <b.galvani@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 11 +++
>>> drivers/watchdog/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/watchdog/rn5t618_wdt.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/mfd/rn5t618.h | 4 +
>>> 4 files changed, 212 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/watchdog/rn5t618_wdt.c
>
> [...]
>
>>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/rn5t618_wdt.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
>
> [...]
>
>>> +static int rn5t618_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdt_dev,
>>> + unsigned int timeout)
>>> +{
>>> + struct rn5t618_wdt *wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdt_dev);
>>> + int ret, i;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rn5t618_wdt_map); i++) {
>>> + if (rn5t618_wdt_map[i].time + 1 >= timeout)
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(rn5t618_wdt_map))
>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>
>> Can you simplify this a bit ? If you use
>>
>> if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(rn5t618_wdt_map))
>> return -EINVAL;
>
> This changes the semantics.
>
How so ? If ret is set to -EINVAL, the rest of the function won't do anything
but eventually return -EINVAL. I don't see why returning -EINVAL immediately
would change that.
Guenter
>>> + else
>>
>> You can drop this else statement.
>>
>>> + ret = regmap_update_bits(wdt->rn5t618->regmap, RN5T618_WATCHDOG,
>>> + RN5T618_WATCHDOG_WDOGTIM_M,
>>> + rn5t618_wdt_map[i].reg_val);
>>> + if (!ret)
>>> + wdt_dev->timeout = rn5t618_wdt_map[i].time;
>
> ... Isn't this important?
>
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-28 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-26 22:13 [PATCH 0/4] Add support for Ricoh RN5T618 PMIC Beniamino Galvani
2014-08-26 22:13 ` [PATCH 1/4] mfd: Add Ricoh RN5T618 PMIC core driver Beniamino Galvani
2014-08-27 7:56 ` Lee Jones
2014-08-27 21:12 ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-08-26 22:13 ` [PATCH 2/4] regulator: add driver for Ricoh RN5T618 regulators Beniamino Galvani
2014-08-27 7:25 ` Mark Brown
2014-08-26 22:13 ` [PATCH 3/4] watchdog: add driver for Ricoh RN5T618 watchdog Beniamino Galvani
2014-08-27 19:01 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-08-27 22:12 ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-08-28 7:19 ` Lee Jones
2014-08-28 12:11 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2014-08-28 12:44 ` Lee Jones
2014-09-04 9:19 ` Lee Jones
2014-09-04 17:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-09-04 17:35 ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-09-28 20:36 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2014-09-28 22:50 ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-09-28 20:35 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2014-08-26 22:13 ` [PATCH 4/4] mfd: rn5t618: document device tree bindings Beniamino Galvani
2014-08-27 7:08 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53FF1C58.3070006@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=b.galvani@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=carlo@caione.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox