From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
Cc: sshefali021@gmail.com, kstewart@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs: add workload-tracing document to admin-guide
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 12:20:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53f52975-98d0-dbb3-9781-0366143f2dd0@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o7qf4m2p.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
On 1/30/23 16:52, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
>
>> On 1/28/23 01:35, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> Adding another section that doesn't seem to a be a good fit feels a bit
>>> like "making things worse than better". So wouldn't this maybe be a
>>> good opportunity to create a totally new top-level section for
>>> application developers and system integrators, even if it's tiny for
>>> now? The audience is likely big enough to justify that -- and the topics
>>> are likely different enough, too (of course sometimes there will be
>>> overlap, as always). Any maybe it will help to bring other stuff over
>>> from admin guide that is more targeted for application developers and
>>> system integrators, which will help to get more structure into the
>>> admin-guide.
>>>
>>
>> I like the idea of creating a new top-level section for application developers
>> and system integrators. I foresee this section growing and also we can look
>> at other documents that are a good fit under this category and move them over.
>>
>> Jon, Thoughts on this.
>
> The fit with the admin guide caught my attention as well, but I didn't
> immediately have a better place to suggest. I am somewhat resistant to
> creating another top-level directory; I really want to have *fewer* of
> them. I certainly don't want to create one for a single document. My
> inclination would be to leave it where it is for now; we can always
> revisit this if it turns out we have a lot of material that justifies a
> new book.
>
Makes perfect sense. I didn't want to suggest a new top level for the same
reasons. For now I will send v3 keeping it in the same location.
I will take a pass at the existing documents under admin-guide and in other
places to see if others could be grouped under a top-level as suggested by
Thorsten
thanks,
-- Shuah
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-31 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-27 23:46 [PATCH v2] docs: add workload-tracing document to admin-guide Shuah Khan
2023-01-28 3:14 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-01-30 23:19 ` Shuah Khan
2023-01-28 5:40 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-01-30 23:20 ` Shuah Khan
2023-01-28 8:35 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-01-30 23:30 ` Shuah Khan
2023-01-30 23:52 ` Jonathan Corbet
2023-01-31 19:20 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53f52975-98d0-dbb3-9781-0366143f2dd0@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@leemhuis.info \
--cc=sshefali021@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox