public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>,
	Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Cc: "Amery Hung" <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com,
	"Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2 09/15] selftests/bpf: Fix double thread join in uprobe_multi_test
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 09:54:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53f7ac2f-3e7f-485e-ae46-040518ee7610@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260218003041.1156774-10-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>

On 2/17/26 4:30 PM, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
> ASAN reported a "joining already joined thread" error. The
> release_child() may be called multiple times for the same struct
> child.
> 
> Fix with a memset(0) call at the end of release_child().
> 
> Acked-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
> index 2ee17ef1dae2..be6ff1d4a75b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ static void release_child(struct child *child)
>  	close(child->c2p[1]);
>  	if (child->pid > 0)
>  		waitpid(child->pid, &child_status, 0);
> +	memset(child, 0, sizeof(*child));

The CI is failing because of this change.

Apparently, there are asserts on child object after it's released in
kick_child(), so we can't just memset it (without changing the test
logic).  The previous version of the fix [1], resetting only
child->thread, is more appropriate I think.

I missed this because uprobe_multi is in DENYLIST.asan

I'll wait a bit in case there is more feedback and send a v3.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260212011356.3266753-10-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev/

>  }
>  
>  static void kick_child(struct child *child)



  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-18 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-18  0:30 [PATCH bpf v2 00/15] selftests/bpf: Fixes for userspace ASAN Ihor Solodrai
2026-02-18  0:30 ` [PATCH bpf v2 01/15] selftests/bpf: Pass through build flags to bpftool and resolve_btfids Ihor Solodrai
2026-02-18  0:30 ` [PATCH bpf v2 02/15] resolve_btfids: Fix memory leaks reported by ASAN Ihor Solodrai
2026-02-18  0:30 ` [PATCH bpf v2 03/15] selftests/bpf: Add DENYLIST.asan Ihor Solodrai
2026-02-18  0:30 ` [PATCH bpf v2 04/15] selftests/bpf: Refactor bpf_get_ksyms() trace helper Ihor Solodrai
2026-02-18  0:30 ` [PATCH bpf v2 05/15] selftests/bpf: Fix memory leaks in tests Ihor Solodrai
2026-02-19 23:58   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-02-18  0:30 ` [PATCH bpf v2 06/15] selftests/bpf: Fix cleanup in check_fd_array_cnt__fd_array_too_big() Ihor Solodrai
2026-02-18  0:30 ` [PATCH bpf v2 07/15] veristat: Fix a memory leak for preset ENUMERATOR Ihor Solodrai
2026-02-18  0:30 ` [PATCH bpf v2 08/15] selftests/bpf: Fix use-after-free in xdp_metadata test Ihor Solodrai
2026-02-18  0:30 ` [PATCH bpf v2 09/15] selftests/bpf: Fix double thread join in uprobe_multi_test Ihor Solodrai
2026-02-18 17:54   ` Ihor Solodrai [this message]
2026-02-18 18:47     ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-02-22 22:18     ` [PATCH bpf v2 09/15] selftests/bpf: Fix double thread join in uprobe_multi_testg Jiri Olsa
2026-02-18  0:30 ` [PATCH bpf v2 10/15] selftests/bpf: Fix resource leaks caused by missing cleanups Ihor Solodrai
2026-02-18  0:30 ` [PATCH bpf v2 11/15] selftests/bpf: Free bpf_object in test_sysctl Ihor Solodrai
2026-02-20  0:08   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-02-18  0:30 ` [PATCH bpf v2 12/15] selftests/bpf: Fix array bounds warning in jit_disasm_helpers Ihor Solodrai
2026-02-18  0:30 ` [PATCH bpf v2 13/15] selftests/bpf: Fix out-of-bounds array access bugs reported by ASAN Ihor Solodrai
2026-02-18  0:30 ` [PATCH bpf v2 14/15] selftests/bpf: Check BPFTOOL env var in detect_bpftool_path() Ihor Solodrai
2026-02-18 16:44   ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-02-18 17:38   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-18 18:17     ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-02-19  1:12       ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-02-19  1:39         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-18  0:30 ` [PATCH bpf v2 15/15] selftests/bpf: Don't override SIGSEGV handler with ASAN Ihor Solodrai
2026-02-18 15:12   ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-02-20  0:36     ` Eduard Zingerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53f7ac2f-3e7f-485e-ae46-040518ee7610@linux.dev \
    --to=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=yatsenko@meta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox