From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753555AbaH2OfG (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:35:06 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:56842 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752666AbaH2OfE (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:35:04 -0400 Message-ID: <54008F96.20601@canonical.com> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 16:35:02 +0200 From: Stefan Bader User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Vrabel , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk CC: Kees Cook , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] Solved the Xen PV/KASLR riddle References: <20140827204940.GA10556@laptop.dumpdata.com> <1409248903-19625-1-git-send-email-stefan.bader@canonical.com> <20140829140823.GF3609@laptop.dumpdata.com> <54008DDA.3040701@canonical.com> <54008EAE.2020601@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <54008EAE.2020601@citrix.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3ggTPdltkJnGeVeCMlbKCVdTk26BETpqX" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --3ggTPdltkJnGeVeCMlbKCVdTk26BETpqX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 29.08.2014 16:31, David Vrabel wrote: > On 29/08/14 15:27, Stefan Bader wrote: >> >> Ok, I rework the patch and re-send it (freshly, iow not part of this t= hread). >> And while I am at it, I would add the stable tag. >=20 > Can you use a different title? Perhaps: >=20 > x86/xen: fix 64-bit PV guest kernel page tables for KASLR >=20 > David >=20 I can change the title but would not want to include KASLR. Because that = is just indirectly responsible. This is a fix for a problem that always was there= but just escaped notice until KASLR caused the layout to change. This could h= ave done independently before. Or, like I mentioned in the last email, be caused by a large initrd. -Stefan --3ggTPdltkJnGeVeCMlbKCVdTk26BETpqX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUAI+WAAoJEOhnXe7L7s6jjHoQAIcRRrQm9DGiCyZCKWomsKaX LR/y2rZjmSMAyUmeCJ1WcDpLdaL0FOtg/YTQKAFMBbJz/ZqKCDDM9bzIfkFhqwXg gUzLgpyOJ4gYnCPJYtMiOVb+3w+dD45v8AlBlMZKidvCic2dJ/0dU41cTakA5CzQ gGD4nQ491ptnqEo+P6W2jijV7o1A5QqvdvxRUGpAZCX+3i2XsHlPgDiRzOJfMvBr Ce4958S+Zi5pUbdAdb1UDglX3c+glddVFqPTIiVBi1hxeAdK2KQN3pQPknbKRoW/ Yl7V3fZwdoOPpIp5BMIl58nv6dh2lSNEABTi5eEeiSKNygI6tD6PYL0X4KAMg01e LP/V52HpuvFbcwRrCwl23N3urvE61goVECZY2ISuEwu0vqlstEFHjc3tBQG6kNDN zoNwB6DZ5FJAX45j2uJex8Q8Po/5uo82UuDryk+xYyILv9Bqc5ws7Z8IWfNC7Euu V2jr36hVzbY+boLfAmRzLs7H9bpeuE7n8rkbp4V/60jRoNTvVBH4WYwEpmxf/UX8 FoQpuI3jQ29JC3/jzFqeLO+ljRLyRlod/FFziSd2DJG2BEY3Qal/QFXHrKAlgf9r n2RCxKemS9harPGEZbcNXL19Vu+o9zgHCSojGigY4dQSvqPchknElcrcAd6zQgoK LV374jfv+AgpKWTjjrPw =vLML -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3ggTPdltkJnGeVeCMlbKCVdTk26BETpqX--