From: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: SCSI development list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_debug: deadlock between completions and surprise module removal
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:52:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5404CE6A.8090402@interlog.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140901153629.GA29938@infradead.org>
On 14-09-01 11:36 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c 2014-08-26 13:24:51.646948507 -0400
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c 2014-08-30 18:04:54.589226679 -0400
>> @@ -2743,6 +2743,13 @@ static int stop_queued_cmnd(struct scsi_
>> if (test_bit(k, queued_in_use_bm)) {
>> sqcp = &queued_arr[k];
>> if (cmnd == sqcp->a_cmnd) {
>> + devip = (struct sdebug_dev_info *)
>> + cmnd->device->hostdata;
>> + if (devip)
>> + atomic_dec(&devip->num_in_q);
>> + sqcp->a_cmnd = NULL;
>
> Why would the hostdata every be NULL here? We should never
> call ->slave_destroy on a device that has outstanding commands.
To your first question, perhaps it could not be. In
the scsi_debug driver almost all uses of 'devip'
check for NULL, so it may not always have been true.
'rmmod scsi_debug' would lead to scsi_debug_exit()
being called and that called stop_all_queued() which
deadlocked with a command completion, or worse command
commencement. scsi_debug_exit() looks a bit racy: the
first thing it does is stop_all_queued() but has
anything been done to stop new commands being issued?
Later scsi_debug_exit() brings down the hosts.
This patch is primarily a bug fix for the lk 3.17 series and
the code you highlight was simply moved from being under a
lock to outside that lock. I didn't want to be too creative,
it's too easy to slip up and upset the management.
Enhancements could be sent to your drivers-for-3.18 tree. Rob
Elliott already has a few in mind, to improve performance.
Removing all 'devip' NULL checks would also improve performance,
and readability.
Doug Gilbert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-01 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-31 23:09 [PATCH] scsi_debug: deadlock between completions and surprise module removal Douglas Gilbert
2014-09-01 15:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-01 19:52 ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2014-09-05 5:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-05 13:56 ` Douglas Gilbert
2014-09-05 15:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-09-06 14:40 ` Douglas Gilbert
2014-09-06 14:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-08 9:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-09-08 15:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-08 20:31 ` Douglas Gilbert
2014-09-09 15:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-25 12:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-03 18:16 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5404CE6A.8090402@interlog.com \
--to=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).