From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Cc: Peter Kieser <peter@kieser.ca>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcache changes for 3.17
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:44:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5409CC3D.7040009@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5409C5FC.6020406@kernel.dk>
On 09/05/2014 04:17 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> We need to do something about this. From this latest pull, looks like
> all should go to stable:
>
> 5b1016e62f74c53e0330403025954c8d95384c03
> 9aa61a992acceeec0d1de2cd99938421498659d5
> dbd810ab678d262d3772d29b65844d7b20dc47bc
> 8b326d3a2a76912dfed2f0ab937d59fae9512ca2
> e5112201c1285841f8b565ece5d6ae7e0d7947a2
> a664d0f05a2ec02c8f042db536d84d15d6e19e81
> c5aa4a3157b55bdca18dd2a9d9f43314470b6d32
> 9e5c353510b26500bd6b8309823ac9ef2837b761
> bcf090e0040e30f8409e6a535a01e6473afb096f
> 501d52a90cbe652b41336c206ff0e95799d5a9b5
> 8e0948080670f6330229718b15a6a1a011d441ce
> 60ae81eee86dd7a520db8c1e3d702b49fc0418b5
> 913dc33fb2720fb5f979011664294137ddd8b13b
> 6b708de64adb6dc8319e7aeac922b46904fbeeec
> 400ffaa2acd72274e2c7293a9724382383bebf3e
> d83353b319d47ef8cce82467da6a25c2d558253f
> bf0c55c986540483c34ca640f2eef4c3314388b1
> c9a78332b42cbdcdd386a95192a716b67d1711a4
> 2452cc89063a2a6890368f185c4b6d7d8802175b
> 25abade29616d42d60f9bd5e6a5ad07f7314e39e
> 5b25abade29616d42d60f9bd5e6a5ad07f7314e3
> 789d21dbd9d8889e62c79ec19585fcc97e42ef07
> 0781c8748cf1ea2b0dcd966571103909528c4efa
>
> (from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3, going
> all the way back to 3.10 would be a lot of work. If there's anyone that
> cares about bcache on stable kernels (and actually use it), now would be
> a good time to pipe up.
>
Then if it's too much work, it just confirmed what was asked previously:
bcache is still experimental so mark it such for stable kernels.
I wouldn't have used bcache in that case.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-05 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-05 4:33 [GIT PULL] bcache changes for 3.17 Kent Overstreet
2014-08-05 16:58 ` Jens Axboe
2014-08-10 7:54 ` Peter Kieser
2014-09-05 7:31 ` Francis Moreau
2014-09-05 14:17 ` Jens Axboe
2014-09-05 14:28 ` Vasiliy Tolstov
2014-09-05 14:30 ` Jens Axboe
2014-09-05 14:44 ` Francis Moreau [this message]
2014-09-05 21:46 ` Greg KH
2014-09-05 15:37 ` Eddie Chapman
2014-09-05 16:41 ` Peter Kieser
2014-09-05 17:03 ` Arne Wiebalck
2014-09-05 17:10 ` Jens Axboe
2014-09-05 18:33 ` Kent Overstreet
2014-09-05 18:46 ` Stefan Priebe
2015-02-05 13:40 ` Francis Moreau
2014-09-06 0:33 ` Chuck Ebbert
2014-09-05 21:45 ` Greg KH
2014-09-05 22:21 ` Jens Axboe
2014-09-08 15:26 ` Greg KH
2014-09-05 23:17 ` Peter Kieser
2014-09-08 15:27 ` Greg KH
2014-09-06 9:23 ` Francis Moreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5409CC3D.7040009@gmail.com \
--to=francis.moro@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kmo@daterainc.com \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter@kieser.ca \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).