From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755751AbaIIGW3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2014 02:22:29 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19663 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753658AbaIIGW1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2014 02:22:27 -0400 Message-ID: <540E9C60.4090103@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 02:21:20 -0400 From: Jon Masters Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Zyngier , Hanjun Guo CC: Tomasz Nowicki , Catalin Marinas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Mark Rutland , Olof Johansson , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , "graeme.gregory@linaro.org" , Arnd Bergmann , Sudeep Holla , Will Deacon , Jason Cooper , Bjorn Helgaas , Daniel Lezcano , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Robert Richter , Lv Zheng , Robert Moore , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Liviu Dudau , Randy Dunlap , Charles Garcia-Tobin , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Add GICv2 specific ACPI boot support References: <1409583475-6978-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1409583475-6978-14-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <5404AE56.80801@arm.com> <5405AE95.1020201@linaro.org> <5405BFE7.5060005@arm.com> <5405E626.4090306@linaro.org> <5406EDDC.3020208@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <5406EDDC.3020208@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/03/2014 06:30 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 02/09/14 16:45, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> This value is for max processors entries in MADT, and we will use it to scan MADT >> for SMP/GIC Init, I just make it big enough for GICv3/4. since ACPI core will stop >> scan MADT if the real numbers of processors entries are reached no matter >> how big ACPI_MAX_GICV3_CPU_INTERFACE_ENTRIES is, I think we can just >> define a number big enough then it will work (x86 and ia64 did the same thing). > > Also, with GICv3++, there is no such thing as a memory-mapped CPU > interface anymore. What you get is a bunch of redistributors (one per > CPU). I assume what you have here actually describe the redistributors, > and its name should reflect that. (though you could have a GICv3/v4 system providing a legacy GICv2(m) compatibility mode having the CPU memory interfaces still defined) Jon.