From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756264AbaIKQON (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:14:13 -0400 Received: from service87.mimecast.com ([91.220.42.44]:34239 "EHLO service87.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755568AbaIKQOK convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:14:10 -0400 Message-ID: <5411CA4D.30202@arm.com> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:14:05 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Graeme Gregory CC: Sudeep Holla , Catalin Marinas , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , Mark Rutland , "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" , Will Deacon , Lv Zheng , Rob Herring , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Daniel Lezcano , Robert Moore , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , Charles Garcia-Tobin , Robert Richter , Jason Cooper , Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier , Liviu Dudau , Mark Brown , Bjorn Helgaas , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "graeme.gregory@linaro.org" , Randy Dunlap , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "hanjun.guo@linaro.org" , Olof Johansson Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 References: <1409583475-6978-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <20140911132935.068DCC408F6@trevor.secretlab.ca> <20140911153739.GA24416@localhost> <5411C664.4060007@arm.com> <20140911160627.GU6558@xora-haswell.xora.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20140911160627.GU6558@xora-haswell.xora.org.uk> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Sep 2014 16:14:03.0661 (UTC) FILETIME=[679873D0:01CFCDDB] X-MC-Unique: 114091117140609201 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/09/14 17:06, Graeme Gregory wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 04:57:24PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> >> [...] >> This what we have suggested in past especially for this S-state support. >> Currently the core acpi code compiles in sleep support unconditionally. >> That doesn't mean we need to do the same on ARM64, we can easily make >> sure that's not enabled for ARM64 until we have clarification on how to >> support them on ARM in ACPI specification. >> >> I just pointed out at one "out of spec" workaround done for x86 >> "unconditionally" in the code just to tell that it won't work on ARM. >> That shouldn't be misunderstood as demand for refactoring as we have no >> clue how S-state would look on ARM to take up any such task. >> > For the sleep.c case I worked on this and sent some updates to Hanjun so > it should be compiled out in the next version of the patches. > Thanks Graeme, that's much better than any hooks/stubs which might fail depending on ACPI table contents. Regards, Sudeep