From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752655AbaIKV7N (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:59:13 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.11.231]:43030 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751044AbaIKV7K (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:59:10 -0400 Message-ID: <54121B2C.5090702@codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:59:08 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxime Ripard CC: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Bjorn Andersson , Stephen Warren , Peter De Schrijver , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: a case for a common efuse API? References: <53BC4DD7.20906@codeaurora.org> <20140709083509.GQ13423@lukather> <53BDD0F3.7040906@codeaurora.org> <20140710142616.GD27469@lukather> In-Reply-To: <20140710142616.GD27469@lukather> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/10/14 07:26, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > I guess that the kind of things we could discuss after posting these > patches, but yep, it looks reasonnable. > > I'll try to get things a bit cleaner, and post them in the next days. > I never saw anything. Did you do any cleaning/posting? I'm going to try it out today/tomorrow to see if it can make some things cleaner. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation