From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752262AbaILPyl (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:54:41 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([93.93.135.160]:37220 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751587AbaILPyj (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:54:39 -0400 Message-ID: <5413173A.9070705@collabora.co.uk> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 17:54:34 +0200 From: Javier Martinez Canillas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Anderson CC: Andrew Morton , Alessandro Zummo , Olof Johansson , Krzysztof Kozlowski , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-samsung-soc , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v9 1/5] rtc: max77686: Allow the max77686 rtc to wakeup the system References: <1410509864-10019-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1410509864-10019-2-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Doug, On 09/12/2014 05:12 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas > wrote: >> From: Doug Anderson >> >> The max77686 includes an RTC that keeps power during suspend. It's >> convenient to be able to use it as a wakeup source. >> >> NOTE: due to wakeup ordering problems this patch alone doesn't work so >> well on exynos5250-snow. You also need something that brings the i2c >> bus up before the max77686 wakeup runs. > > This note made sense when the patch was first submitted, but no longer > does since the i2c change landed. See: > > b19c195 i2c: s3c2410: resume the I2C controller earlier > You are right, I completely forgot to check if that actually landed and to remove the note in that case... Maybe when the set is applied the note can be removed from this patch or do you think that I should re-spin the series for that? Best regards, Javier