From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751825AbaILRkE (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:40:04 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45543 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751003AbaILRkB (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:40:01 -0400 Message-ID: <54132FC9.5040201@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 19:39:21 +0200 From: Daniel Borkmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Catalin Marinas CC: Will Deacon , "davem@davemloft.net" , "zlim.lnx@gmail.com" , "ast@plumgrid.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH arm64-next] net: bpf: arm64: address randomize and write protect JIT code References: <1410505897-20122-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> <20140912160345.GF5532@arm.com> <54131D87.9060008@redhat.com> <20140912164656.GH5532@arm.com> <54132A76.4070501@redhat.com> <20140912172151.GI5532@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20140912172151.GI5532@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/12/2014 07:21 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: ... > We don't have a brk instruction for arm32 but we have guaranteed > undefined space. Have a look at the kgdb support for example (or grep > for register_undef_hook under arch/arm) to get an idea. Will do, thanks! >> Last but not least ;), if I would resend it today, would you queue >> it for later on, or do you want to handle it differently? > > You can send it now, it will be pushed upstream at the right time. Just did, thanks a lot for your help!