From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752908AbaILVb0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2014 17:31:26 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12893 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752106AbaILVbX (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2014 17:31:23 -0400 Message-ID: <541365D9.4050908@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 17:30:01 -0400 From: Jon Masters Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Will Deacon CC: "hanjun.guo@linaro.org" , Catalin Marinas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Mark Rutland , Olof Johansson , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" , Liviu Dudau , Lv Zheng , Rob Herring , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Daniel Lezcano , Robert Moore , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , Charles Garcia-Tobin , Robert Richter , Jason Cooper , Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier , Tomasz Nowicki , Mark Brown , Bjorn Helgaas , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "graeme.gregory@linaro.org" , Randy Dunlap , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse MADT for SMP initialization References: <1409583475-6978-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1409583475-6978-10-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <540E80BD.20801@redhat.com> <540E88A2.1000606@linaro.org> <540E93A0.4040306@redhat.com> <540F2422.90105@linaro.org> <540F24FF.2060302@redhat.com> <20140911141508.GK6158@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20140911141508.GK6158@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/11/2014 10:15 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 05:04:15PM +0100, Jon Masters wrote: >> On 09/09/2014 12:00 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>> No, you didn't miss it, I'm still working on the new version, sorry I didn't >>> clarify that in my previous email. >> >> Thanks. If you could copy me on the next posting that would rock. In a >> few hours we should have another platform posted as an example. In >> addition, a couple of lower priority patches (building upon the core >> ACPI pieces) should be posted as well. > > Can I breath out yet or did I miss the platform posting? There's a posting for AMD Seattle coming soon as an example. Also, there should be some hardware at Connect on which patches can run. Jon.