From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>, Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>, Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse FADT table to get PSCI flags for PSCI init
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 07:34:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54177778.2050103@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140915063808.GC26649@localhost>
On 2014年09月15日 14:38, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:00:07PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/psci.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/psci.h
>> index e5312ea..2454bc5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/psci.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/psci.h
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>> #ifndef __ASM_PSCI_H
>> #define __ASM_PSCI_H
>>
>> -int psci_init(void);
>> +int psci_dt_init(void);
>> +int psci_acpi_init(void);
>>
>> #endif /* __ASM_PSCI_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
>> index 693da7f..9e1ae37 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
>> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
>> * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> */
>>
>> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: " fmt
>> +
>> #include <linux/init.h>
>> #include <linux/acpi.h>
>> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
>> @@ -49,10 +51,32 @@ void __init __acpi_unmap_table(char *map, unsigned long size)
>> early_memunmap(map, size);
>> }
>>
>> +static int __init acpi_parse_fadt(struct acpi_table_header *table)
>> +{
>> + struct acpi_table_fadt *fadt = (struct acpi_table_fadt *)table;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Revision in table header is the FADT Major revision,
>> + * and there is a minor revision of FADT which was introduced
>> + * by ACPI 5.1, we only deal with ACPI 5.1 or higher revision
>> + * to get arm boot flags, or we will disable ACPI.
>> + */
>> + if (table->revision > 5 ||
>> + (table->revision == 5 && fadt->minor_revision >= 1))
>> + return 0;
> The commend and code disagree. The code says 5.1 or newer, while the comment say
> _only_ 5.1. One or the other needs to change.
I describe it in the comments "ACPI 5.1 or higher revision", maybe
"newer revision" will be more explicit.
>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
>> index 5539547..15ba470 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>>
>> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "psci: " fmt
>>
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>> #include <linux/init.h>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> #include <linux/smp.h>
>> @@ -23,6 +24,7 @@
>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>> #include <uapi/linux/psci.h>
>>
>> +#include <asm/acpi.h>
>> #include <asm/compiler.h>
>> #include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
>> #include <asm/errno.h>
>> @@ -231,6 +233,33 @@ static void psci_sys_poweroff(void)
>> invoke_psci_fn(PSCI_0_2_FN_SYSTEM_OFF, 0, 0, 0);
>> }
>>
>> +static void psci_0_2_set_functions(void)
>> +{
>> + pr_info("Using standard PSCI v0.2 function IDs\n");
>> + psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_SUSPEND;
>> + psci_ops.cpu_suspend = psci_cpu_suspend;
>> +
>> + psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF] = PSCI_0_2_FN_CPU_OFF;
>> + psci_ops.cpu_off = psci_cpu_off;
>> +
>> + psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_ON] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_ON;
>> + psci_ops.cpu_on = psci_cpu_on;
>> +
>> + psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_MIGRATE] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_MIGRATE;
>> + psci_ops.migrate = psci_migrate;
>> +
>> + psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_AFFINITY_INFO] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_AFFINITY_INFO;
>> + psci_ops.affinity_info = psci_affinity_info;
>> +
>> + psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE] =
>> + PSCI_0_2_FN_MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE;
>> + psci_ops.migrate_info_type = psci_migrate_info_type;
>> +
>> + arm_pm_restart = psci_sys_reset;
>> +
>> + pm_power_off = psci_sys_poweroff;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * PSCI Function IDs for v0.2+ are well defined so use
>> * standard values.
>> @@ -264,29 +293,7 @@ static int __init psci_0_2_init(struct device_node *np)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - pr_info("Using standard PSCI v0.2 function IDs\n");
>> - psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_SUSPEND;
>> - psci_ops.cpu_suspend = psci_cpu_suspend;
>> -
>> - psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF] = PSCI_0_2_FN_CPU_OFF;
>> - psci_ops.cpu_off = psci_cpu_off;
>> -
>> - psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_ON] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_ON;
>> - psci_ops.cpu_on = psci_cpu_on;
>> -
>> - psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_MIGRATE] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_MIGRATE;
>> - psci_ops.migrate = psci_migrate;
>> -
>> - psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_AFFINITY_INFO] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_AFFINITY_INFO;
>> - psci_ops.affinity_info = psci_affinity_info;
>> -
>> - psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE] =
>> - PSCI_0_2_FN_MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE;
>> - psci_ops.migrate_info_type = psci_migrate_info_type;
>> -
>> - arm_pm_restart = psci_sys_reset;
>> -
>> - pm_power_off = psci_sys_poweroff;
>> + psci_0_2_set_functions();
>>
>> out_put_node:
>> of_node_put(np);
>> @@ -339,7 +346,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id psci_of_match[] __initconst = {
>> {},
>> };
>>
>> -int __init psci_init(void)
>> +int __init psci_dt_init(void)
>> {
>> struct device_node *np;
>> const struct of_device_id *matched_np;
>> @@ -354,6 +361,29 @@ int __init psci_init(void)
>> return init_fn(np);
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * We use PSCI 0.2+ when ACPI is deployed on ARM64 and it's
>> + * explicitly clarified in SBBR
>> + */
>> +int __init psci_acpi_init(void)
>> +{
>> + if (!acpi_psci_present()) {
>> + pr_info("is not implemented in ACPI.\n");
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pr_info("probing for conduit method from ACPI.\n");
>> +
>> + if (acpi_psci_use_hvc())
>> + invoke_psci_fn = __invoke_psci_fn_hvc;
>> + else
>> + invoke_psci_fn = __invoke_psci_fn_smc;
>> +
>> + psci_0_2_set_functions();
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>>
>> static int __init cpu_psci_cpu_init(struct device_node *dn, unsigned int cpu)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
>> index 5796734..7ba20d4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
>> @@ -398,10 +398,12 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>> efi_idmap_init();
>>
>> cpu_logical_map(0) = read_cpuid_mpidr() & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK;
>> - if (acpi_disabled)
>> + if (acpi_disabled) {
>> unflatten_device_tree();
>> -
>> - psci_init();
>> + psci_dt_init();
>> + } else {
>> + psci_acpi_init();
>> + }
> This is slightly nitty now, but I think it'd be slightly easier to follow
> boot path if the switch for acpi disabled/enabled was in psci.c. It'd also allow
> psci_dt_init() and psci_acpi_init() to be static.
>
> I.e. keep a psci_init() and just make it call one or the other.
Do you mean something like blow in psci.c?
int __init psci_init(void)
{
if (acpi_disabled)
return psci_dt_init();
else
return psci_acpi_init();
}
Thanks
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-15 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-12 13:59 [PATCH v4 00/18] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 Hanjun Guo
2014-09-12 13:59 ` [PATCH v4 01/18] ARM64: Move the init of cpu_logical_map(0) before unflatten_device_tree() Hanjun Guo
2014-09-12 19:34 ` Jon Masters
2014-09-15 6:16 ` Olof Johansson
2014-09-17 16:48 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-12 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 02/18] ACPI / table: Add new function to get table entries Hanjun Guo
2014-09-15 16:48 ` Grant Likely
2014-09-12 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 03/18] ACPI / table: Count matched and successfully parsed entries without specifying max entries Hanjun Guo
2014-09-15 16:48 ` Grant Likely
2014-09-12 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 04/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Get RSDP and ACPI boot-time tables Hanjun Guo
2014-09-12 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 05/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce sleep-arm.c Hanjun Guo
2014-09-12 14:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-12 15:18 ` Graeme Gregory
2014-09-12 15:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-12 16:32 ` Graeme Gregory
2014-09-17 1:31 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-09-12 19:43 ` Jon Masters
2014-09-12 20:03 ` Graeme Gregory
2014-09-12 21:10 ` Jon Masters
2014-09-12 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 06/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce early_param for "acpi" Hanjun Guo
2014-09-15 6:28 ` Olof Johansson
2014-09-15 14:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-15 16:09 ` Olof Johansson
2014-09-15 16:31 ` Jon Masters
2014-09-15 22:55 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-09-12 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 07/18] ARM64 / ACPI: If we chose to boot from acpi then disable FDT Hanjun Guo
2014-09-12 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 08/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Make PCI optional for ACPI on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-09-12 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 09/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse FADT table to get PSCI flags for PSCI init Hanjun Guo
2014-09-15 6:38 ` Olof Johansson
2014-09-15 14:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-15 23:24 ` Jon Masters
2014-09-15 23:34 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2014-09-12 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 10/18] ACPI / table: Print GIC information when MADT is parsed Hanjun Guo
2014-09-15 6:40 ` Olof Johansson
2014-09-15 14:11 ` Jon Masters
2014-09-15 17:52 ` Grant Likely
2014-09-15 18:01 ` Olof Johansson
2014-09-15 21:55 ` Jon Masters
2014-09-12 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 11/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse MADT for SMP initialization Hanjun Guo
2014-09-12 19:47 ` Jon Masters
2014-09-15 14:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-15 23:19 ` Jon Masters
2014-09-15 7:00 ` Olof Johansson
2014-09-16 0:01 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-09-12 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 12/18] ACPI / processor: Make it possible to get CPU hardware ID via GICC Hanjun Guo
2014-09-15 7:05 ` Olof Johansson
2014-09-16 0:11 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-09-12 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 13/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC and register device's gsi Hanjun Guo
2014-09-12 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 14/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Add GICv2 specific ACPI boot support Hanjun Guo
2014-09-12 19:48 ` Jon Masters
2014-09-15 15:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-15 16:16 ` Jon Masters
2014-09-15 16:42 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-17 7:40 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2014-09-17 15:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-18 2:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-18 16:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-12 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 15/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse GTDT to initialize arch timer Hanjun Guo
2014-09-15 7:13 ` Olof Johansson
2014-09-12 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 16/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Select ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY if ACPI is enabled on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-09-12 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 17/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Enable ARM64 in Kconfig Hanjun Guo
2014-09-12 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 18/18] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-09-15 7:33 ` Olof Johansson
2014-09-17 1:44 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-09-17 1:57 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-09-17 8:58 ` Jon Masters
2014-09-17 17:02 ` Mark Brown
2014-09-17 16:05 ` Graeme Gregory
2014-09-17 23:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-17 23:40 ` Graeme Gregory
2014-09-18 15:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-18 23:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-18 23:59 ` Jon Masters
2014-09-17 19:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-17 19:22 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-09-17 19:29 ` Jon Masters
2014-09-17 20:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-17 19:59 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-09-17 23:06 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-09-22 19:48 ` Pavel Machek
2014-09-22 20:31 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-09-22 22:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-22 22:28 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-09-22 22:34 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-09-22 22:38 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-09-22 23:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-22 22:55 ` Al Stone
2014-09-22 23:07 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-09-22 22:40 ` Al Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54177778.2050103@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).