From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752827AbaIPGxk (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 02:53:40 -0400 Received: from dehamd003.servertools24.de ([31.47.254.18]:52743 "EHLO dehamd003.servertools24.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752026AbaIPGxj (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 02:53:39 -0400 Message-ID: <5417DE72.8020700@ladisch.de> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:53:38 +0200 From: Clemens Ladisch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What are the official opinions of the developers about develop currently code in binary, hexadecimal and assembly code? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-PPP-Message-ID: <20140916065304.604685.19615@dehamd003.servertools24.de> X-PPP-Vhost: ladisch.de Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org françai s wrote: > The official opinions of the developers "The developers" is not a uniform group that could hold a coherent opinion, let alone an "official" one. > is currently necessary develop code in binary, hexadecimal and > assembly code? It is usually not the preferred form for making modifications. Regards, Clemens