From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754781AbaIQI7l (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:59:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29001 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753385AbaIQI7i (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:59:38 -0400 Message-ID: <54194D22.7060706@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:58:10 -0400 From: Jon Masters Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Garrett , Hanjun Guo CC: Catalin Marinas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Mark Rutland , Olof Johansson , Grant Likely , Will Deacon , linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, Liviu Dudau , Lv Zheng , Rob Herring , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Daniel Lezcano , Robert Moore , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com, Robert Richter , Jason Cooper , Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier , Mark Brown , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Graeme Gregory , Randy Dunlap , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 18/18] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64 References: <1410530416-30200-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1410530416-30200-19-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <20140917014410.GC31214@srcf.ucam.org> In-Reply-To: <20140917014410.GC31214@srcf.ucam.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/16/2014 09:44 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:00:16PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > >> +Common _DSD bindings should be submitted to ASWG to be included in the >> +document :- >> + >> +http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-implementation-guide-toplevel.htm > > How are individuals/companies who aren't UEFI members supposed to do > this? Aren't there IP issues involved in taking submissions from > non-members? Obviously, I'm not a lawyer, but I would note that the _DSD bindings aren't going into the core ACPI document. I think the specifics for non members of the UEFI to potentially contribute bindings need to be addressed. That said, at this point, the population of the UEFI forum is very well aligned with initial players (that this is the case is not entirely an accident, I went around to a few folks a year or so ago and made sure that they had become members in anticipation of this issue). Jon.